Comparison Overview
Neon Mobile

Neon Mobile
N/A
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Neon-Mobile is giving small and medium size business powerful customer facing tools and an immersive mobile presence for a fraction of the cost of developing stand-alone applications. Touch-friendly, no application store visit required, Neon’s ground breaking approach e...

Myntra
Devarabeesanahalli Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Myntra, we don’t just follow fashion - we define it. As India's leading fashion, lifestyle, and beauty destination, we bring together the best of style, technology, and innovation to create a seamless shopping experience for our customers. With a commitment to empow...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Neon Mobile







Myntra






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Neon Mobile in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Myntra in 2026.
Incident History - Neon Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Neon Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Myntra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Myntra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Neon Mobile

Myntra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.