Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Navigate360Navigate360
VS
TÜV Rheinland GroupTÜV Rheinland Group
Navigate360

Navigate360

3900 Kinross Lakes Pkwy , Suite 200, Richfield, Ohio, US, 44286

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://navigate360.com/
644/1000Poor

Navigate360 is the leading provider of safety solutions for schools, leading to enhanced student well-being. With more than 20 years of experience, our multifaceted, layered approach—providing everything from curricula that support positive behavior and self-image to ca...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Am Grauen Stein, Cologne, 51105, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tuv.com/impressum
726/1000Moderate

Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and ...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,587
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Navigate360

Navigate360

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Navigate360 has 30.72% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Navigate360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Navigate360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Navigate360

Navigate360

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAV1773930961
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRI1773966644
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUV1765188618

FAQ

Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Navigate360 company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Navigate360 or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Navigate360 or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Navigate360 and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2