Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » NAVAL GROUP » FREITASPANAV1774060009

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FREITASPANAV1774060009)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-56
Company Score Before Incident736 / 1000
Company Score After Incident680 / 1000
Company LinkView NAVAL GROUP Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFREITASPANAV1774060009
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORMisconfigured Public Data
DATA EXPOSEDLocation data of military assets
INCIDENT DATE12/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of NAVAL GROUP's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts NAVAL GROUP Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the NAVAL GROUP breach identified under incident ID FREITASPANAV1774060009.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of NAVAL GROUP's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/naval-group, the number of followers: 408358, the industry type: Defense and Space Manufacturing and the number of employees: 12283 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 736 and after the incident was 680 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on NAVAL GROUP and their customers.

On 13 March 2026, French Naval Group (Charles de Gaulle Carrier Group) disclosed Data Exposure issues under the banner "French Naval Group’s Location Exposed via Fitness App Data".

A security lapse involving a popular fitness app revealed the precise location of France’s Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier and its multinational naval group in the Eastern Mediterranean.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Location data of military assets.

In response, and began remediation that includes Corrective measures to be implemented if report is verified, and stakeholders are being briefed through French Navy spokesperson confirmed the violation of security protocols.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Reinforcement of security protocols regarding the use of fitness apps with public location sharing by military personnel, and recommending next steps like Review and enforce stricter policies on the use of fitness apps with default public settings by military personnel. Consider restrictions on apps with foreign ownership for government and military use.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating junior officer’s use of the app to log a run on the ship’s deck. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed the group’s position through publicly accessible location data and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fitness app...defaults to public location sharing unless manually adjusted. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating publicly accessible location data exposed the group’s position and Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating fitness app with 195 million users and default public sharing. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Financial Theft (T1657) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating potential compromise of naval groups operational security and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating negative impact on French Navys security protocols. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating violated existing security protocols; corrective measures to follow. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (30%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Automated Collection (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Data from Cloud Storage (60%)
Impact
Financial Theft (20%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (40%)

Sources & References