Comparison Overview
National Security Agency

National Security Agency
9800 Savage Rd, Ft. Meade, 20755, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
NSA is at the forefront of U.S. government cryptology, integrating signals intelligence (SIGINT) and cybersecurity to enhance national and allied advantages. Our mission encompasses computer network operations aimed at securing critical insights and services, ensuring d...

General Dynamics
11011 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
From Gulfstream business jets and combat vehicles to nuclear-powered submarines and communications systems, people around the world depend on our products and services for their safety and security. General Dynamics is headquartered in Reston, Virginia, and employs ove...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

National Security Agency







General Dynamics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for National Security Agency in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Dynamics has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - National Security Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
National Security Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Dynamics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Dynamics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

National Security Agency

General Dynamics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
MOOS-IvP through 24.8.1 fails to properly validate variable names extracted from alog files in the SplitHandler, allowing attackers to write files outside the split directory. Attackers can supply crafted alog files with backslash sequences in variable names to escape the output directory and append to arbitrary files on Windows systems.
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/blob/1de9ae146cd63c209e8c3fd81611a4ed2472971b/ivp/src/lib_logutils/SplitHandler.cpp#L189
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/commit/6f0619e905b325d6b88f76425673045c6e4f6f94
- https://github.com/moos-ivp/moos-ivp/pull/137
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ivp-through-24.8.1-alog-splitting-path-traversal-on-windows
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability in CMOOSCommPkt where a four-byte packet triggers out-of-bounds memory access during deserialization. Attackers can open a TCP connection to the MOOSDB port and send a crafted short packet to read memory before authentication.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Comms/MOOSCommPkt.cpp#L228
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/d30c14585753f9ae39749d9628ed15c8383f0568
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/75
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-out-of-bounds-read-via-short-packet
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in CMOOSSerialPort::GetTelegram() that writes a NUL terminator one byte past the serial telegram stack buffer. Attackers controlling the serial line can send a full-length telegram to trigger the off-by-one write, corrupting the stack and potentially enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/Utils/MOOSSerialPort.cpp#L595
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/befb04df2039d0080715ea35f56268092db4ec0f
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/73
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-off-by-one-buffer-overflow-in-serial-telegram-handling
MOOS core-moos through 10.4.0 fails to escape database contents when rendering MOOSDB HTTP pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts. Any MOOS publisher can set variable values containing script payloads that execute in the browser of operators viewing the web interface.
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/blob/ec9c77c68fcbdef8f5e4c60fe243acd223433f0c/Core/libMOOS/DB/HTTPConnection.cpp#L460
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/commit/a3f26f099bb08decb143f704d8b1ca16ae405b44
- https://github.com/themoos/core-moos/pull/78
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-core-moos-through-10.4.0-moosdb-http-pages-stored-cross-site-scripting
MOOS ui-moos through 50b9c6c contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in ScopeTabPane.cpp and ScopeGrid.cpp where client and variable names are formatted into fixed 1024-byte buffers using sprintf without length validation. Attackers can supply arbitrarily long MOOS identifiers that overflow the buffers when an operator selects process list entries or pokes variables, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/blob/50b9c6c65169c501f746cfef1e167f74a7735e74/Tools/Graphical/uMS/ScopeTabPane.cpp#L243
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/commit/a6ebc0bc6cb360315ce620e865f996d189cddb0e
- https://github.com/themoos/ui-moos/pull/5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/moos-ui-moos-through-50b9c6c-ums-buffer-overflow-via-long-moos-identifiers