Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. » NAS1771008146

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NAS1771008146)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-67
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident698 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNAS1771008146
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames, shipping addresses, prescription details
INCIDENT DATE11/01/2024
STATUSOngoing (class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. breach identified under incident ID NAS1771008146.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nassau-candy-distributors-inc., the number of followers: 12217, the industry type: Food and Beverage Services and the number of employees: 678 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 698 with a difference of -67 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Nassau Candy Distributors, Inc. and their customers.

On 12 February 2026, Nassau OOGP Vision Group disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Nassau OOGP Vision Group Data Breach Exposes Customer Information".

Nassau OOGP Vision Group, a New Jersey-based ophthalmic goods distributor, detected unauthorized access to its network by a third party.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, shipping addresses, prescription details.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing (class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A.).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its network by a third party and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating detected unauthorized access to its network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive customer data tied to contact lens orders compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, shipping addresses, and prescription details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive customer data...had been compromised. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its network by a third party. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References