Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Namibia Airports Company Limited » PARNAMTEL1773945547

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PARNAMTEL1773945547)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-112
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident638 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPARNAMTEL1773945547
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORSpear phishing, Software vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSED500 GB of data (claimed...
INCIDENT DATE05/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Namibia Airports Company Limited's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Namibia Airports Company Limited Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Namibia Airports Company Limited breach identified under incident ID PARNAMTEL1773945547.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Namibia Airports Company Limited's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/namibia-airports-company-limited, the number of followers: 1875, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 31 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 638 with a difference of -112 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Namibia Airports Company Limited and their customers.

On 16 March 2026, Namibia Airports Company (NAC) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Inc Ransomware Group Claims Attack on Namibia Airports Company".

The ransomware group Inc has taken responsibility for a cyberattack on Namibia Airports Company (NAC), the state-owned operator of eight major airports in Namibia, which occurred on March 6, 2026.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Network infrastructure, administrative accounts, and exposing 500 GB of data (claimed by Inc).

In response, while recovery efforts such as Services restored continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement on March 16, 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating inc employs spear phishing...to deploy malware and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating software vulnerabilities to deploy malware. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating deploy malware that both steals data and encrypts systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to...administrative accounts. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to network infrastructure and administrative accounts. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated nearly 500 GB of data during the breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrated nearly 500 GB of data (claimed by Inc). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption such as Yes (ransomware). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data exfiltration had been found at the time and Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (T1497) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group known for targeting...government sectors. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (50%)
Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion (40%)

Sources & References