Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Namibia Airports Company Limited » NAMTELPAR1773995423

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NAMTELPAR1773995423)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-173
Company Score Before Incident639 / 1000
Company Score After Incident466 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNAMTELPAR1773995423
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED500GB of sensitive data
INCIDENT DATE19/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Namibia Airports Company Limited's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Namibia Airports Company Limited Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Namibia Airports Company Limited breach identified under incident ID NAMTELPAR1773995423.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Namibia Airports Company Limited's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/namibia-airports-company-limited, the number of followers: 1875, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 31 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 639 and after the incident was 466 with a difference of -173 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Namibia Airports Company Limited and their customers.

On 19 March 2026, Namibia Airports Company (NAC) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Namibia Airports Company Hit by INC Ransomware Group".

The Namibia Airports Company (NAC) has fallen victim to a cyberattack by the INC Ransomware Group, which claims to have stolen 500GB of sensitive data, including financial records, human resources information, and customer details.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting NAC’s network systems, and exposing 500GB of sensitive data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within NAC’s network systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating iNC Ransomware Group targeting public/private sectors globally. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected following unauthorized activity. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized activity within NAC’s network systems. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to financial records, HR info, and customer details. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating iNC Ransomware Group employs double-extortion method and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption confirmed in ransomware attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to HR information and customer details. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 500GB of sensitive data stolen, including financial records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating financial records, HR info, and customer details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 500GB of data stolen; threat to release stolen data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating systems encrypted as part of double-extortion method and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating iNC Ransomware Group announced attack publicly. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
External Remote Services (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement (50%)

Sources & References