Comparison Overview
NAME IT

NAME IT
Fredskovvej 1, Brande, Central Denmark Region 7330, DK
Last Update: 17/05/2026
NAME IT is a part of BESTSELLER and started out as EXIT in 1986. In 1996 NAME IT was introduced as a sub brand and in 2008 EXIT was rebranded as NAME IT. Today NAME IT is represented in more than 20 markets across Europe, Asia, North America, South America and Austr...

Under Armour
101 Performance Dr, Baltimore, 21230, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our Belief: WE USE THE POWER OF SPORTS TO EXPAND EVERY PLAYING FIELD. Our Obsession: WE ARE OBSESSED WITH ATHLETES WHO STRIVE FOR MORE – IN SPORTS, IN LIFE, AND IN THE WORLD. Our Mission: TO INSPIRE ATHLETES WITH INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN SOLUTIONS THEY CAN’T LI...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NAME IT







Under Armour






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NAME IT in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
Under Armour has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - NAME IT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NAME IT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Under Armour (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Under Armour cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NAME IT

Under Armour
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.