Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NAHGA Claim ServicesNAHGA Claim Services
VS
AflacAflac
NAHGA Claim Services

NAHGA Claim Services

04009, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nahgaclaimservices.com
777/1000Fair

We are independently owned and operated Third Party Medical Claims Administrator, building our services on decades of experience in the national insurance market. Specializing in many types of insurance, NCS just might be the answer you’ve been looking for. Why Choos...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
424/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,986
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NAHGA Claim Services

NAHGA Claim Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAHGA Claim Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NAHGA Claim Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAHGA Claim Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NAHGA Claim Services

NAHGA Claim Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAH0402704110625
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1782816142
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1768391547

FAQ

Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NAHGA Claim Services or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NAHGA Claim Services or Aflac ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NAHGA Claim Services and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-61246
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60455
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60439
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60373
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60372
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES