Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » n8n » N8N1770287879

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (N8N1770287879)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident732 / 1000
Company Score After Incident728 / 1000
Company LinkView n8n Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERN8N1770287879
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORNetwork
DATA EXPOSEDCredentials, sensitive data
INCIDENT DATE03/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of n8n's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts n8n Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the n8n breach identified under incident ID N8N1770287879.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of n8n's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/n8n, the number of followers: 256751, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 663 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 732 and after the incident was 728 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on n8n and their customers.

n8n recently reported "Critical RCE Vulnerability in n8n Workflow Automation Platform Disclosed (CVE-2026-25049)", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A newly disclosed critical vulnerability, CVE-2026-25049, in the n8n workflow automation platform enables authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands on the underlying server.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting n8n workflow automation platform (versions prior to 1.123.17 and 2.5.2), and exposing Credentials, sensitive data.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Upgrade to patched versions (1.123.17 or 2.5.2), restrict workflow permissions to trusted users, deploy n8n in a hardened environment with limited OS privileges, and began remediation that includes Patches released in versions 1.123.17 and 2.5.2, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public advisory under GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-6cqr-8cfr-67f8.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Upgrade to patched versions (1.123.17 or 2.5.2) immediately. Restrict workflow permissions to trusted users and deploy n8n in a hardened environment with limited OS privileges as a temporary workaround.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating critical RCE Vulnerability in n8n...enables authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating authenticated user with workflow modification permissions could craft malicious expressions. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating execute arbitrary system commands on the underlying server via RCE (CVE-2026-25049) and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating execute arbitrary system commands on the host system. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypass security controls and achieve remote code execution (RCE). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating steal credentials, exfiltrate data, or install backdoors. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromise servers, steal credentials, exfiltrate data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data compromised such as Credentials, sensitive data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate data, or install backdoors for persistent access. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating install backdoors for persistent access. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating operational impact such as Server compromise, backdoor installation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (80%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (60%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)

Sources & References