Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » N2 Biomedical » N2-1786633153

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (N2-1786633153)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-63
Company Score Before Incident749 / 1000
Company Score After Incident686 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERN2-1786633153
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party intrusion into a SaaS collaboration tool
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and financial information
INCIDENT DATE11/12/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of N2 Biomedical's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts N2 Biomedical Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the N2 Biomedical breach identified under incident ID N2-1786633153.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of N2 Biomedical's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/n2-biomedical, the number of followers: 651, the industry type: Biotechnology Research and the number of employees: 8 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 686 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on N2 Biomedical and their customers.

On 11 August 2026, Integer Precision Technologies LLC (Precision Coating) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Integer Precision Technologies LLC Reports 2025 Data Breach Impacting Sensitive Medical and Personal Data".

Integer Precision Technologies LLC (operating as Precision Coating), a Hudson, Massachusetts-based medical device coatings provider, disclosed a data breach stemming from unauthorized access to a cloud-based file-sharing application in December 2025.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cloud-based file-sharing application, and exposing Sensitive personal and financial information.

In response, and began remediation that includes Offering 24 months of complimentary identity protection and credit monitoring through Experian IdentityWorks, and stakeholders are being briefed through Dedicated email address ([email protected]) for inquiries.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Enrollment in identity protection and credit monitoring available until October 31, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a cloud-based file-sharing application and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party intrusion into a SaaS collaboration tool. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to a cloud-based file-sharing application and Brute Force: Password Spraying (T1110.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party intrusion into a SaaS collaboration tool. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromise of data including SSNs, financial account details, health info and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating files accessed between December 12, 2025, and unspecified end date. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor accessed files in cloud-based file-sharing app and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving sensitive personal and financial information. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data integrity and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive files in cloud app. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Brute Force: Password Spraying (50%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (80%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (70%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References