Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MYE1773707283)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Myers Auto Group's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Myers Auto Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Myers Auto Group breach identified under incident ID MYE1773707283.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Myers Auto Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/myers-auto-group, the number of followers: 368, the industry type: Automotive and the number of employees: 55 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 650 with a difference of -106 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Myers Auto Group and their customers.
Myers Auto Group LLC recently reported "Myers Auto Group Data Breach Settlement", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
In May 2025, Myers Auto Group LLC suffered a targeted cyberattack that compromised the personal data of approximately 4,200 individuals.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data including names, contact details, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and driver’s license numbers, with nearly 4,200 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $15,000 settlement fund (pro rata cash payments) + $120,000 for attorneys’ fees and costs + $1,000 service awards for class representatives.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Settlement notices sent to affected individuals with claim instructions.
The case underscores how Settled (class action resolved), teams are taking away lessons such as The breach underscores ongoing risks to consumer data in cyberattacks targeting corporate systems and the importance of adequate data protection measures, and recommending next steps like Implement stronger data protection measures, enhance monitoring for unauthorized access, and ensure compliance with data security regulations, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Settlement notices with claim instructions sent to affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating targeted cyberattack that compromised the personal data and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattacks targeting corporate systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate data protection measures and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, contact details, dates of birth, SSNs, driver’s license numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of approximately 4,200 individuals compromised. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating targeted cyberattack and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk due to exposed PII. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Myers Auto Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/myers-auto-group/incident/MYE1773707283
- Myers Auto Group CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/myers-auto-group
- Myers Auto Group Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/mye1773707283-myers-auto-group-llc-breach-march-2026/
- Myers Auto Group CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/myers-auto-group/history
- Myers Auto Group CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/settlements/myers-data-incident
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf