What is the official website of Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce ?

The official website of Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is http://www.murraycountychamber.org.

What is Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce's cybersecurity risk score?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 733 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce operate in ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce operates primarily in the Civic and Social Organizations industry.

How many employees does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce employs approximately 6 people worldwide.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce own any subsidiaries ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 276 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce is classified under the NAICS code 8134, which corresponds to Civic and Social Organizations.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/murray-county-chamber-of-commerce.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce have ?

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has an estimated 5,365 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MCCC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

733

/1000

Moderate

758

/1000

Fair

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

murraycountychamber.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Murray County Chamber of Commerce's mission is to make Murray County the best place to live, work, play, and do business.

MCCC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MCCC

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Murray County (GA) ...

Cyber Attack

100

5/2026

MUR1778711468

Loading…

A.I.

MCCC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MCCC

Incidents vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has 16.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types MCCC vs Civic and Social Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce reported 1 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - MCCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MCCC

Civic and Social Organizations

Website: http://www.murraycountychamber.org

Company Size: 2-10 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce Similar Companies

SESI - Serviço Social da Indústria / Departamento Nacional

sesi.org.br

Organization supported by Brazilain industries in order to contribute for industrial entreprises competitiveness and susitainability through the promotion of quality of life of industrial workers. SESI offers services on Education, Health, Leisure and Social Responsibility areas. SESI National Department define and implement strategies, policies and guidelines, leading the "SESI System" and its 27 Regional Departments.

Loading…

NEWS

Murray County (GA) Chamber of Commerce CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…