Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MSA1773153052)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Medical Services of America's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Medical Services of America Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Medical Services of America breach identified under incident ID MSA1773153052.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Medical Services of America's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/msahealthcare, the number of followers: 12543, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 925 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 618 with a difference of -147 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Medical Services of America and their customers.
On 01 June 2025, Leading U.S. healthcare provider disclosed Ransomware, Data Breach issues under the banner "Massive Data Breach Exposes Millions of Records in Major Healthcare Cyberattack".
A significant cyberattack targeting a leading U.S.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Legacy IT infrastructure, systems containing PHI, and exposing Personal health information (PHI), medical records, Social Security numbers, financial details, with nearly Over 5 million records at risk.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Engaged third-party forensic teams to contain the breach, while recovery efforts such as Restoring operations (expected to take months) continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Affected patients notified of potential identity theft risks.
The case underscores how Under review, teams are taking away lessons such as Persistent vulnerabilities in healthcare cybersecurity due to outdated systems and underfunded IT defenses. Urgent need for sector-wide investments in cybersecurity modernization and threat detection capabilities, and recommending next steps like Invest in cybersecurity modernization, patch management, and threat detection capabilities. Enhance monitoring and incident response plans, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected patients notified of potential identity theft risks.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a known vulnerability in the provider’s legacy IT infrastructure. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a known vulnerability in legacy IT infrastructure. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems containing PHI. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a known vulnerability in legacy IT infrastructure. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating delayed critical patches, leaving systems exposed and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated ransomware group with ties to Eastern Europe. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to systems containing PHI, Social Security numbers. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to systems containing PHI, medical records, financial details. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating terabytes of data exfiltrated, including PHI and financial details. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated ransomware group with ties to Eastern Europe. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating terabytes of data exfiltrated before deploying ransomware and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data sold on dark web marketplaces. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating files encrypted by ransomware, demanding multi-million-dollar payment and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware encrypted files, disrupting operations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Medical Services of America Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/msahealthcare/incident/MSA1773153052
- Medical Services of America CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/msahealthcare
- Medical Services of America Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/msa1773153052-us-healthcare-provider-ransomware-february-2021/
- Medical Services of America CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/msahealthcare/history
- Medical Services of America CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cybersecurityventures.com/cybercrime-news/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf