Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » MOIN, Inc. » MOI1765584617

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MOI1765584617)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-75
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident679 / 1000
Company LinkView MOIN, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMOI1765584617
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to file system
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE09/12/2025
STATUSContained

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of MOIN, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts MOIN, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MOIN, Inc. breach identified under incident ID MOI1765584617.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MOIN, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/moin-inc., the number of followers: 927, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 59 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 679 with a difference of -75 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MOIN, Inc. and their customers.

On 10 December 2025, Nium, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Nium Data Breach Involving PII Exposure".

Nium, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting File storage infrastructure, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), with nearly 13 (Massachusetts) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Quick containment after detection, and stakeholders are being briefed through Email notifications to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Contained, and recommending next steps like Affected individuals should remain vigilant for phishing attempts and impersonation scams, and enroll in complimentary credit monitoring services, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected customers are encouraged to contact Nium at [email protected] for questions or to enroll in credit monitoring services.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the company’s file system and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious access attempts targeting its file storage infrastructure. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating old file from 2022 stored in a system meant for technical logs. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating download of sensitive customer data from file system. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to file storage infrastructure. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating breach was quickly contained and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating old file containing PII stored in technical logs system. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References