Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Work Health SolutionsWork Health Solutions
VS
OptumOptum
Work Health Solutions

Work Health Solutions

2101 Forest Ave, San Jose, 95128, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
703/1000Moderate

We’re redefining the occupational health space to deliver better programs and care for all. We create proactive, customized solutions to keep workspaces healthy, safe and productive, so employees can thrive and reach their full potential.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Optum

Optum

11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie , 55344, US

Last Update: 06/10/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.optum.com/en/
664/1000Weak

We’re evolving health care so everyone can have the opportunity to live their healthiest life. It’s why we put your unique needs at the heart of everything we do, making it easy and affordable to manage health and well-being. We are delivering the right care how and whe...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:114,542
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Work Health Solutions

Work Health Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Optum

Optum

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Work Health Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Optum in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Work Health Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Work Health Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Optum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Optum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Work Health Solutions

Work Health Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOR21324123
🔒 Incident : Breach
MOB040091825
Optum

Optum

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OPT001102824
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNI1012070724
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNICHA1768835481

FAQ

Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Work Health Solutions company and Optum company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Work Health Solutions and Optum, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Work Health Solutions and Optum, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Work Health Solutions or Optum ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Work Health Solutions or Optum ?
Between Work Health Solutions and Optum, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Work Health Solutions and Optum, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3