What is the official website of MOBILE ?

The official website of MOBILE is http://wwww.flexform.com.br.

What is MOBILE's cybersecurity risk score?

MOBILE has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 818 out of 1000, indicating a Good security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has MOBILE experienced?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has MOBILE been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does MOBILE have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does MOBILE have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does MOBILE comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does MOBILE have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does MOBILE comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, MOBILE is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does MOBILE have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,MOBILE is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does MOBILE operate in ?

MOBILE operates primarily in the Furniture industry.

How many employees does MOBILE have ?

MOBILE employs approximately 5,134 people worldwide.

Does MOBILE own any subsidiaries ?

MOBILE presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does MOBILE have ?

MOBILE's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

Does MOBILE have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, MOBILE does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does MOBILE have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, MOBILE maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mobile.

How many cybersecurity incidents has MOBILE experienced ?

As of July 31, 2026, Rankiteo reports that MOBILE has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does MOBILE have ?

MOBILE has an estimated 798 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has MOBILE faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MOBILE

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

818

/1000

Good

843

/1000

Good

MOBILE Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

flexform.com.br

Add Your Compliance Badge

sales enterprise

MOBILE A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MOBILE

MOBILE CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

MOBILE

Breach

1/2025

MOBVIE177023796...

Loading…

A.I.

MOBILE Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MOBILE

Incidents vs Furniture Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOBILE in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOBILE in 2026.

Incident Types MOBILE vs Furniture Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOBILE in 2026.

Incident History - MOBILE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

MOBILE Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MOBILE

Furniture

Website: http://wwww.flexform.com.br

Company Size: 11-50 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

MOBILE Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

MOBILE CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 05, 2026 02:55 PM

RedAlert Mobile Espionage Campaign Targets Civilians with Trojanized Rocket Alert App for Surveillance

RedAlert espionage campaign spreads trojanized Israel alert app via SMS phishing, turning a safety tool into spyware.

Read Article

March 05, 2026 06:18 AM

U Mobile announces AI and cybersecurity capabilities at MWC 2026

U Mobile partners Palo Alto Networks to explore a network-based Security-as-a-Service offering as well as partners ZTE (Malaysia)...

Read Article

March 03, 2026 05:33 AM

Motorola to offer enhanced mobile security by partnering with GrapheneOS of Google

At the recently concluded Mobile World Congress (MWC) in Barcelona, Motorola announced a significant shift in its software strategy that...

Read Article

February 27, 2026 06:35 PM

Cutting-edge cybersecurity Mobile Training Vehicle (MTV) dropped by Del Mar College’s Heritage Campus on Feb. 26-27 to provide awareness tours

When it comes to cybersecurity training, the Cybersecurity Manufacturing Innovation Institute, or CyManII, is focused on creating technical...

Read Article

February 26, 2026 09:11 AM

Anthropic Introduces Claude Code for Remote Terminal Control From Mobile Devices

Launched in Research Preview for Claude Max users, it promises workflow flexibility but sparks cybersecurity concerns over remote access to...

Read Article

February 23, 2026 11:08 AM

Aconnic : to showcase cybersecurity and digital sovereignty solutions at Mobile World Congress 2026 in Barcelona

aconnic AG , Munich, will present its latest cybersecurity, digital sovereignty, and high-performance network infrastructure solutions at...

Read Article

February 19, 2026 08:00 AM

Cyber Attack on the Largest Dutch Mobile Network Operator Odido Affects 6.2 Million Customers

A cyber attack on the largest telecommunications service provider in the Netherlands, Odido, has leaked the personal information of over 6...

Read Article

February 17, 2026 11:00 AM

The European Commission Data Breach Compromises Infrastructure for Managing Mobile Devices

The Commission has confirmed that the data breach leaked staff members' names, mobile phone numbers, and business email addresses,...

Read Article

February 13, 2026 08:00 AM

New Mobile Spyware ZeroDayRAT Targets Android and iOS

A new mobile spyware operation known as ZeroDayRAT has been documented targeting both Android and iOS devices.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-66720

SUMMARY

The GOOSE subscriber component improperly validates the UTC timestamp field in unauthenticated IEC 61850 GOOSE (EtherType 0x88B8) Layer-2 multicast messages. A specially crafted GOOSE frame containing an undersized timestamp field can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read during message processing, causing the process to crash and resulting in a denial-of-service condition.

Published

Date2026-07-30

Updated

Date2026-07-30

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66421

SUMMARY

OpenClaw Dashboard contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the administrator's browser session by injecting HTML markup into agent transcript messages processed through the sessions API. Attackers can craft a message containing inline event handler payloads such as an img tag with an onerror attribute within the 60-character rendering budget, which is stored in the session transcript and interpolated unsanitized into innerHTML on the default landing page, allowing theft of session tokens and unauthorized calls to authenticated administrative endpoints including agent instruction file modification.

Published

Date2026-07-30

Updated

Date2026-07-30

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66420

SUMMARY

MeshCentral 1.1.21 contains a cross-site WebSocket hijacking protection bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to hijack authenticated administrator sessions by exploiting an unconditional early return in the CheckWebServerOriginName() function within webserver.js when self-signed certificates are in use. Attackers can open cross-origin WebSocket connections to any of the twelve WebSocket endpoints, send crafted action commands to exfiltrate the server sessionKey used to sign session cookies, forge session tokens as arbitrary users, and gain full remote control of all managed devices governed by the MeshCentral instance.

Published

Date2026-07-30

Updated

Date2026-07-30

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66369

SUMMARY

The GOOSE parser contains an off-by-one boundary-handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer-2 multicast frame on the process bus. When specific GOOSE message fields are processed, the parser advances its internal buffer position incorrectly, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. On affected platforms, this condition reliably terminates the subscriber process and causes a denial-of-service.

Published

Date2026-07-30

Updated

Date2026-07-30

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66364

SUMMARY

The GOOSE payload parser contains a boundary handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer 2 multicast frame on the process bus. When processing specific payload fields, an attacker controlled inner element length may exceed its enclosing length, causing the parser to over read by one byte. This out-of-bounds read reliably terminates the subscriber process, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.

Published

Date2026-07-30

Updated

Date2026-07-30

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…