Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota PERAMinnesota PERA
VS
UK Home OfficeUK Home Office
Minnesota PERA

Minnesota PERA

60 Empire Drive, Saint Paul, 55103, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mnpera.org
761/1000Fair

PERA serves more than half a million current and former public employees from more than 3,500 local units of government throughout the state of Minnesota. Established in 1931, PERA administers three statewide retirement plans providing defined benefit plan coverage to ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, GB, SW1P 4DF

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile

At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - k...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,485
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota PERA

Minnesota PERA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota PERA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota PERA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota PERA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UK Home Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Home Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota PERA

Minnesota PERA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UK Home Office

UK Home Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-1777581082
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-0694206092025

FAQ

Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota PERA company and UK Home Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota PERA and UK Home Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota PERA and UK Home Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota PERA or UK Home Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota PERA or UK Home Office ?
Between Minnesota PERA and UK Home Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota PERA and UK Home Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA