Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesMinnesota Department of Natural Resources
VS
NavNav
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

St. Paul, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mndnr.gov
765/1000Fair

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) works with citizens to conserve and manage the state's natural resources, to provide outdoor recreation opportunities, and to provide for commercial uses of natural resources in a way that creates a sustainable quality...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,124
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nav

Nav

Fyrstikkalléen 1, Oslo, 0661, NO

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nav.no
781/1000Fair

Nav er en viktig del av sikkerhetsnettet i velferdsstaten. Vi skal bidra til at flere kommer i arbeid og færre går på stønad, og samtidig sørge for at de som trenger det er sikra inntekt og økonomisk trygghet gjennom rett pengestøtte til rett tid. For å løse dette samf...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,220
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nav

Nav

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nav in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nav (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nav cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nav

Nav

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources company and Nav company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Nav, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Nav, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or Nav ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or Nav ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Nav, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Nav, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9