Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (DEBMMJNAP1781130260)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of MMJ Real Estate's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts MMJ Real Estate Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MMJ Real Estate breach identified under incident ID DEBMMJNAP1781130260.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MMJ Real Estate's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mmj-real-estate, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 143 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 825 and after the incident was 781 with a difference of -44 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MMJ Real Estate and their customers.
DeBra’s recently reported "Australian Lingerie Retailer DeBra’s Allegedly Breached by Threat Actor 2019", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
An Australian women’s lingerie and swimwear retailer, DeBra’s, is reportedly the latest victim of a data breach, with threat actor 2019 claiming to have exfiltrated sensitive customer and order records.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 196,800 customer records and 1.2 million order records, with nearly 1,396,800 (196,800 customer records + 1.2 million order records) records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Pending verification.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating retailer...reportedly the latest victim of a data breach and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor 2019 has targeted multiple Australian organizations. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loyalty program details, transaction histories compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 196,800 customer records and 1.2 million order records exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating threat actor 2019 claimed to have exfiltrated sensitive records and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data made available for download to facilitate financial fraud. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high risk of identity theft and targeted phishing attacks and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential brand reputation damage due to data exposure. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- MMJ Real Estate Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mmj-real-estate/incident/DEBMMJNAP1781130260
- MMJ Real Estate CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mmj-real-estate
- MMJ Real Estate Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/debmmjnap1781130260-debras-napoleon-perdis-mmj-real-estate-breach-june-2026/
- MMJ Real Estate CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mmj-real-estate/history
- MMJ Real Estate CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.cyberdaily.au/security/13724-exclusive-2019-claims-breach-of-australian-lingerie-retailer
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf