What is the official website of MIT Technology Review ?

The official website of MIT Technology Review is http://www.technologyreview.com/.

What is MIT Technology Review's cybersecurity risk score?

MIT Technology Review has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 780 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has MIT Technology Review experienced?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has MIT Technology Review been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does MIT Technology Review have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does MIT Technology Review have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does MIT Technology Review comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does MIT Technology Review have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does MIT Technology Review comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, MIT Technology Review is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does MIT Technology Review have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,MIT Technology Review is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does MIT Technology Review operate in ?

MIT Technology Review operates primarily in the Book and Periodical Publishing industry.

How many employees does MIT Technology Review have ?

MIT Technology Review employs approximately 2,197 people worldwide.

Does MIT Technology Review own any subsidiaries ?

MIT Technology Review presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does MIT Technology Review have ?

MIT Technology Review's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,527,537 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for MIT Technology Review ?

MIT Technology Review is classified under the NAICS code 511, which corresponds to Publishing Industries (except Internet).

Does MIT Technology Review have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, MIT Technology Review does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does MIT Technology Review have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, MIT Technology Review maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mit-technology-review.

How many cybersecurity incidents has MIT Technology Review experienced ?

As of August 15, 2026, Rankiteo reports that MIT Technology Review has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does MIT Technology Review have ?

MIT Technology Review has an estimated 5,161 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MTR

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

780

/1000

Fair

805

/1000

Good

MIT Technology Review Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

technologyreview.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1899, MIT Technology Review is a digitally oriented independent media company whose analysis, features, reviews, interviews, and live events explain the commercial, social, and political impact of new technologies. MIT Technology Review readers are curious technology enthusiasts—a global audience of business and thought leaders, innovators and early adopters, entrepreneurs and investors. Every day, we provide an authoritative filter for the flood of information about technology. We are the first to report on a broad range of new technologies, informing our audiences about how important breakthroughs will impact their careers and their lives. Get our journalism:

MTR A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MTR

MIT Technology Review CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

MTR Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MTR

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Technology Review in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Technology Review in 2026.

Incident Types MTR vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Technology Review in 2026.

Incident History - MTR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

MIT Technology Review Subsidiaries

MTR

Book and Periodical Publishing

Website: http://www.technologyreview.com/

Company Size: 51-200 employees

EmTech DigitalBook and Periodical Publishing

Loading…

MIT Technology Review Similar Companies

Forbes

forbes.com

Forbes Media is a global media, branding and technology company, with a focus on news and information about business, investing, technology, entrepreneurship, leadership and affluent lifestyles. The company publishes Forbes, Forbes Asia, and Forbes Europe magazines as well as Forbes.com. The Forbes brand today reaches more than 94 million people worldwide with its business message each month through its magazines and 37 licensed local editions around the globe, Forbes.com, TV, conferences, research, social and mobile platforms. Forbes Media’s brand extensions include conferences, real estate, education, financial services, and technology license agreements. Forbes is an equal opportunity employer.

Loading…

NEWS

MIT Technology Review CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 23, 2026 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity Jobs Report: 3.5 Million Unfilled Positions In 2025

While tech firms are firing, our industry is hiring Download Report.

Read Article

February 12, 2026 08:00 AM

AI is already making online crimes easier. It could get much worse.

Some cybersecurity researchers say it's too early to worry about AI-orchestrated cyberattacks. Others say it could already be happening.

Read Article

January 28, 2026 08:00 AM

Rules fail at the prompt, succeed at the boundary

From the Gemini Calendar prompt-injection attack of 2026 to the September 2025 state-sponsored hack using Anthropic's Claude code as an...

Read Article

December 24, 2025 08:00 AM

Meet the man hunting the spies in your smartphone

Ronald Deibert and his research group, the Citizen Lab, have rigorously worked to unveil alarming digital threats for the past two decades.

Read Article

December 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Delivering securely on data and AI strategy

Most organizations feel the imperative to keep pace with continuing advances in AI capabilities, as highlighted in a recent MIT Technology...

Read Article

November 10, 2025 08:00 AM

Reimagining cybersecurity in the era of AI and quantum

AI and quantum technologies are dramatically reconfiguring how cybersecurity functions, redefining the speed and scale with which digital...

Read Article

September 09, 2025 07:00 AM

Adapting to new threats with proactive risk management

In July 2024, a botched update to the software defenses managed by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike caused more than 8 million Windows systems...

Read Article

July 17, 2025 07:00 AM

Finding value from AI agents from day one

Imagine AI so sophisticated it could read a customer's mind? Or identify and close a cybersecurity loophole weeks before hackers strike?

Read Article

July 11, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity’s global alarm system is breaking down

The global early warning system that alerts security teams to dangerous software flaws is showing critical gaps in coverage.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-74250

SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

Published

Date2026-08-14

Updated

Date2026-08-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ossa/+bug/2163017

CVE-2026-74247

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

Published

Date2026-08-14

Updated

Date2026-08-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-74245

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

Published

Date2026-08-14

Updated

Date2026-08-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-74244

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

Published

Date2026-08-14

Updated

Date2026-08-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-74243

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

Published

Date2026-08-14

Updated

Date2026-08-14

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…