What is the official website of MIR Belting ?

The official website of MIR Belting is http://www.mir-belting.com.

What is MIR Belting's cybersecurity risk score?

MIR Belting has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 757 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has MIR Belting experienced?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has MIR Belting been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does MIR Belting have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does MIR Belting have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does MIR Belting comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does MIR Belting have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does MIR Belting comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, MIR Belting is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does MIR Belting have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,MIR Belting is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does MIR Belting operate in ?

MIR Belting operates primarily in the Industrial Automation industry.

How many employees does MIR Belting have ?

MIR Belting employs approximately 414 people worldwide.

Does MIR Belting own any subsidiaries ?

MIR Belting presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does MIR Belting have ?

MIR Belting's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 5,754 followers.

Does MIR Belting have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, MIR Belting does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does MIR Belting have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, MIR Belting maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mir-belting.

How many cybersecurity incidents has MIR Belting experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that MIR Belting has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does MIR Belting have ?

MIR Belting has an estimated 851 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MIR Belting

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

757

/1000

Fair

782

/1000

Fair

MIR Belting Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mir-belting.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Founded in 1980, MIR specializes in the fabrication and distribution of lightweight conveyor belting and industrial conveyor products. We focus on providing value-added products and services through all our full service sales and fabrication facilities located across the United States, with our corporate headquarters located in St. Louis, Missouri. With highly-trained technicians available 24/7 for field installations and a staff with more than 1,500 aggregate years of belting experience, MIR has earned a reputation as the premier independent specialty fabricator and distributor of lightweight belting and conveyor accessories in North America. Mission Statement Our mission is to enhance MIR’s market leadership position by creating an

MIR Belting A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MIR Belting

MIR Belting CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

MIR Belting Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MIR Belting

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIR Belting in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIR Belting in 2026.

Incident Types MIR Belting vs Industrial Automation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIR Belting in 2026.

Incident History - MIR Belting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

MIR Belting Subsidiaries

MIR Belting

Industrial Automation

Website: http://www.mir-belting.com

Company Size: 201-500 employees

AMMEGAAutomation Machinery Manufacturing

Ammeraal BeltechAutomation Machinery Manufacturing

Green Belting IndustriesTextile Manufacturing

Megadyne GroupAutomation Machinery Manufacturing

Jason IndustrialAutomation Machinery Manufacturing

SamplaAutomation Machinery Manufacturing

ChempreneManufacturing

Loading…

MIR Belting Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

MIR Belting CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

October 21, 2024 07:00 AM

MiR releases new software to improve scalability and cybersecurity for its autonomous mobile robots

Autonomous mobile robot maker Mobile Industrial Robots (MiR) has launched MiR Fleet Enterprise – a scalable, flexible and secure fleet...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…