Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Minot Area Development Corporation » CITMIN1775024825

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CITMIN1775024825)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-98
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident655 / 1000
Company LinkView Minot Area Development Corporation Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCITMIN1775024825
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE30/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Minot Area Development Corporation's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Minot Area Development Corporation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Minot Area Development Corporation breach identified under incident ID CITMIN1775024825.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Minot Area Development Corporation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/minot-area-development-corporation, the number of followers: 215, the industry type: Non-profit Organization Management and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 655 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Minot Area Development Corporation and their customers.

On 31 March 2024, Minot Water Treatment Plant disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Attack Disrupts Minot Water Treatment Plant Operations".

A ransomware attack targeted a computer server at the Minot Water Treatment Plant in North Dakota on March 14.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Computer server at water treatment plant.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Affected server taken offline.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Enhanced training, communication protocols, and preventative system design needed.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack targeted a computer server at the Minot Water Treatment Plant and Valid Accounts (T1078) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attackers may have used compromised credentials to access the server. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack targeted a computer server. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack...forcing plant staff to rely on manual procedures. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating affected server was immediately taken offline. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack targeted a computer server. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (40%)

Sources & References