What is the official website of Minnesota Judicial Branch ?

The official website of Minnesota Judicial Branch is http://www.mncourts.gov.

What is Minnesota Judicial Branch's cybersecurity risk score?

Minnesota Judicial Branch has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 690 out of 1000, indicating a Weak security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Minnesota Judicial Branch experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Minnesota Judicial Branch been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving Thomson Reuters Case Center (formerly CaseLines), with the incident ID MIN1788441114.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Minnesota Judicial Branch is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Minnesota Judicial Branch is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Minnesota Judicial Branch operate in ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch operates primarily in the Administration of Justice industry.

How many employees does Minnesota Judicial Branch have ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch employs approximately 1,119 people worldwide.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch own any subsidiaries ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Minnesota Judicial Branch have ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,028 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Minnesota Judicial Branch ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch is classified under the NAICS code 92211, which corresponds to Courts.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Minnesota Judicial Branch does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Minnesota Judicial Branch have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/minnesota-judicial-branch.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Minnesota Judicial Branch experienced ?

As of October 6, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Minnesota Judicial Branch has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Minnesota Judicial Branch have ?

Minnesota Judicial Branch has an estimated 407 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Minnesota Judicial Branch faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MJB

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

690

/1000

Weak

715

/1000

Moderate

Minnesota Judicial Branch Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mncourts.gov

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Minnesota Judicial Branch is made up of 10 judicial districts with 293 district court judgeships, 19 Court of Appeals judges, and 7 Supreme Court justices. The Judicial Branch is governed by the Judicial Council, which is chaired by Natalie E. Hudson, Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court. The Minnesota Judicial Branch is mandated by the Minnesota Constitution to resolve disputes promptly and without delay. https://bit.ly/m/MNCourts

MJB

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Minnesota Judicial ...

Breach

9/2026

Thomson Reuters...

MIN1788441114

Loading…

A.I.

MJB Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MJB

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Minnesota Judicial Branch has 20.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Minnesota Judicial Branch has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types MJB vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Minnesota Judicial Branch reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - MJB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Minnesota Judicial Branch Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MJB

Administration of Justice

Website: http://www.mncourts.gov

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Minnesota Judicial Branch Similar Companies

United States Courts

uscourts.gov

The U.S. Courts, located in courthouses across the nation, safeguard the constitutional rights and liberties of the public. Judges, court clerks, federal public defenders, law clerks, probation and pretrial services officers, technology specialists, human resources and budget specialists, administrative staff, and many others with a variety of skills and talents work in support of this mission. We invite you to learn more about us and join the people who work to help ensure equal justice under the law. About the Courts As Guardians of the Constitution, the U.S. Courts address cases and controversies that can impact the lives of all Americans. The U.S. Courts: - Help individuals and businesses who cannot pay their debts. - Resolve civil disputes involving failure to meet legal agreements. - Decide criminal cases alleging violations of federal criminal laws. - Conduct naturalization ceremonies for new U.S. citizens. - Work with criminal defendants and offenders in the probation and pretrial system. - Provide federal public defenders to those who cannot afford legal counsel. - Call those 18 years and older to serve on juries. - Call witnesses to testify in civil or criminal cases. The U.S. Courts System is comprised of the U.S. Supreme Court; 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals; 94 U.S. District Courts, which include U.S. Bankruptcy Courts; Courts of Special Jurisdiction; U.S. Probation and U.S. Pretrial Services Offices; Federal Public Defenders Offices; and several support agencies, including the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, the Federal Judicial Center, and the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

Loading…

NEWS

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

February 03, 2026 08:00 AM

Government Lawyer in ICE Case Tells Judge: ‘This Job Sucks’

A US government attorney expressed unusual frustration in a courtroom proceeding about the difficulty in ensuring Immigration and Customs...

Read Article

November 24, 2025 08:00 AM

How lawyers can navigate AI and cybersecurity

The legal profession is undergoing a significant transformation with the integration of advanced technologies into the practice of law.

Read Article

November 18, 2025 08:00 AM

AI-generated evidence showing up in court alarms judges

AI's growing abilities to create realistic videos, images, documents and audio have judges worried about the trustworthiness of evidence in...

Read Article

August 28, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity experts assess threats to federal courts’ online dockets

The federal judiciary is strengthening online docket security after cyberattacks exposed sensitive case data, raising national security...

Read Article

August 25, 2025 07:00 AM

US senator calls for independent review of federal judiciary cybersecurity

U.S. Senator Ron Wyden on Monday asked Chief U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts to commission an independent review of the federal...

Read Article

August 15, 2025 07:00 AM

Sweeping Security Breach Hits a Federal Court Filing System, Exposing Sensitive Non-Public Case Files

A U.S. federal court filing system has experienced a security breach after suspected nation-state actors potentially accessed highly...

Read Article

August 12, 2025 07:00 AM

Russia Is Suspected to Be Behind Breach of Federal Court Filing System

Federal officials are scrambling to assess the damage and address flaws in a sprawling, heavily used computer system long known to have...

Read Article

August 06, 2025 07:00 AM

Federal court filing system hit in sweeping hack

The identities of confidential court informants are feared compromised in a series of breaches across multiple U.S. states.

Read Article

June 08, 2025 07:00 AM

Business People: Jennifer Lauerman to head up Canterbury Park marketing

GAMING Canterbury Park Racetrack and Casino, Shakopee, announced that Jennifer Lauerman has been named vice president of marketing and...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-105761

SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

Published

Date2026-10-05

Updated

Date2026-10-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105760

SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

Published

Date2026-10-05

Updated

Date2026-10-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105759

SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

Published

Date2026-10-05

Updated

Date2026-10-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105758

SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

Published

Date2026-10-05

Updated

Date2026-10-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105757

SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

Published

Date2026-10-05

Updated

Date2026-10-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Minnesota Judicial Branch Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

MJB A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News & History

MJB Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for MJB

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types MJB vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - MJB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Judicial Branch Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MJB

Minnesota Judicial Branch Similar Companies

United States Courts

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News

Government Lawyer in ICE Case Tells Judge: ‘This Job Sucks’

How lawyers can navigate AI and cybersecurity

AI-generated evidence showing up in court alarms judges

Cybersecurity experts assess threats to federal courts’ online dockets

US senator calls for independent review of federal judiciary cybersecurity

Sweeping Security Breach Hits a Federal Court Filing System, Exposing Sensitive Non-Public Case Files

Russia Is Suspected to Be Behind Breach of Federal Court Filing System

Federal court filing system hit in sweeping hack

Business People: Jennifer Lauerman to head up Canterbury Park marketing

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News & History

MJB Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for MJB

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types MJB vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - MJB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Judicial Branch Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MJB

Minnesota Judicial Branch Similar Companies

United States Courts

Minnesota Judicial Branch CyberSecurity News

Government Lawyer in ICE Case Tells Judge: ‘This Job Sucks’

How lawyers can navigate AI and cybersecurity

AI-generated evidence showing up in court alarms judges

Cybersecurity experts assess threats to federal courts’ online dockets

US senator calls for independent review of federal judiciary cybersecurity

Sweeping Security Breach Hits a Federal Court Filing System, Exposing Sensitive Non-Public Case Files

Russia Is Suspected to Be Behind Breach of Federal Court Filing System

Federal court filing system hit in sweeping hack

Business People: Jennifer Lauerman to head up Canterbury Park marketing

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo