Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPSMinnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS
VS
TÜV Rheinland GroupTÜV Rheinland Group
Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

Minnesota St, St Paul, Minnesota, US, 55101

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://dps.mn.gov/
676/1000Weak

We are successful when Minnesotans receive the services they need when and how they need them, and when we engage with our community partners in promoting safety, service and justice. Mission Serving all communities to build a safer Minnesota. Vision Leveraging the...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:421
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Am Grauen Stein, Cologne, 51105, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tuv.com/impressum
726/1000Moderate

Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and ...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,587
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS has 34.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MIN1773268407
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUV1765188618

FAQ

Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Department of Public Safety - DPS and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA