Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ministerie van Financiën » MINMINMIN1774341208

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MINMINMIN1774341208)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident768 / 1000
Company Score After Incident704 / 1000
Company LinkView Ministerie van Financiën Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMINMINMIN1774341208
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE18/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ministerie van Financiën's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ministerie van Financiën Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ministerie van Financiën breach identified under incident ID MINMINMIN1774341208.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ministerie van Financiën's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ministry-of-finance-of-netherlands, the number of followers: 86751, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 6084 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 768 and after the incident was 704 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ministerie van Financiën and their customers.

On 19 March 2025, Dutch Ministry of Finance disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Dutch Ministry of Finance Cyberattack".

The Dutch Ministry of Finance confirmed a cyberattack on March 19, when unauthorized access was detected in critical systems within its policy department.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Critical systems within the policy department.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Access to compromised systems restricted on March 23.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access was detected in critical systems within its policy department and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers may have been present in its networks...lingering undetected. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers may have been present in its networks...lingering undetected for extended periods. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access was detected in critical systems within its policy department. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers may have been present in its networks...lingering undetected for extended periods and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating delay in containment has raised questions. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access was detected in critical systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on March 19...unauthorized access was detected. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (60%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Impact
Defacement (40%)

Sources & References