Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Microsoft_SharePoint » MIC1768636894

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MIC1768636894)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident769 / 1000
Company Score After Incident767 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMIC1768636894
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-49704)
DATA EXPOSEDCredentials, sensitive data via web...
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2012
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Microsoft_SharePoint's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Microsoft_SharePoint Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microsoft_SharePoint breach identified under incident ID MIC1768636894.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microsoft_SharePoint's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft_sharepoint, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 769 and after the incident was 767 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microsoft_SharePoint and their customers.

On 19 July 2025, Microsoft SharePoint Server Users disclosed Ransomware and Espionage issues under the banner "Critical SharePoint Vulnerabilities Exploited by Chinese Threat Actors, Leading to Ransomware Attacks".

On July 19, 2025, Microsoft disclosed active exploitation of two critical vulnerabilities in on-premises SharePoint servers (CVE-2025-49706 and CVE-2025-49704).

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting On-premises SharePoint servers (2016, 2019, Subscription Edition), and exposing Credentials, sensitive data via web shells and lateral movement.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Apply SharePoint security updates, Enable AMSI in Full Mode and Deploy Microsoft Defender Antivirus, and began remediation that includes Patch SharePoint servers and Monitor for IOCs (web shells, malicious files, C2 domains).

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Immediate patching and monitoring are critical to preventing exploitation of critical vulnerabilities. Organizations should rotate machine keys and enable AMSI to detect web shell activity, and recommending next steps like Apply SharePoint security updates immediately, Enable AMSI in Full Mode and deploy Microsoft Defender Antivirus and Rotate SharePoint ASP.NET machine keys and restart IIS after patching, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Microsoft urges organizations to apply patches and monitor for exploitation activity.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including exploitation of SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-49704), and pOST request to the ToolPane endpoint to bypass authentication. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating remote code execution via SharePoint vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-49704) and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating runs *whoami* and other commands to enumerate privileges. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating web shell deployment (e.g., *spinstall0.aspx*), Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating creates scheduled tasks for persistence, and Event Triggered Execution: Component Object Model Hijacking (T1546.015) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating manipulates IIS components to load malicious .NET assemblies. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploits SharePoint vulnerabilities to gain elevated privileges. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypass authentication via ToolPane endpoint and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating web shells and malicious files (e.g., *spinstall0.aspx*). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (T1003.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating uses Mimikatz to extract credentials from LSASS memory and Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating machineKey theft during exploitation. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery: Local Account (T1087.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating runs *whoami* and other commands to enumerate privileges and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating lateral movement using PsExec, WMI, and Impacket. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (T1021.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating leverages PsExec, WMI, and Impacket to spread across networks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credentials, sensitive data via web shells and lateral movement. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating c2 domains (*update.updatemicfosoft.com*, *msupdate.updatemicfosoft.com*). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating warlock ransomware deployment via Group Policy Objects (GPOs). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (85%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (95%)
Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (80%)
Event Triggered Execution: Component Object Model Hijacking (75%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Indicator Removal: File Deletion (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (90%)
Steal Application Access Token (85%)
Discovery
Account Discovery: Local Account (80%)
File and Directory Discovery (75%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (75%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)

Sources & References