Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Microsoft » ANAMIC1785423158

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ANAMIC1785423158)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-16
Company Score Before Incident665 / 1000
Company Score After Incident649 / 1000
Company LinkView Microsoft Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERANAMIC1785423158
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE22/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Microsoft's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Microsoft Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microsoft breach identified under incident ID ANAMIC1785423158.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microsoft's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft, the number of followers: 28486112, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 233556 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 665 and after the incident was 649 with a difference of -16 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microsoft and their customers.

On 26 July 2026, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) disclosed Data Breach and Extortion issues under the banner "Analog Devices Data Breach and Extortion Threat".

Analog Devices, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True, with nearly 570,000 (claimed by ExfilSquad) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems on June 23, 2026 and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of operational disruptions (implies stealthy access). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems (implies credential compromise). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers exfiltrated certain files from its systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating hackers exfiltrated certain files; 570,000 records claimed stolen. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (Extortion) (T1471) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating extortion group ExfilSquad claimed 570,000 records stolen. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no operational disruptions reported (implies evasion of detection). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (Extortion) (70%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (60%)

Sources & References