Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Microsoft Security Response Center » MIC1784298242

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MIC1784298242)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident164 / 1000
Company Score After Incident160 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMIC1784298242
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORLocal
DATA EXPOSEDAdministrator’s application data and configurations...
INCIDENT DATE13/07/2026
STATUSUnpatched (Microsoft acknowledged but no CVE assigned)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Microsoft Security Response Center's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Microsoft Security Response Center Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microsoft Security Response Center breach identified under incident ID MIC1784298242.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microsoft Security Response Center's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-security-response-center, the number of followers: 75070, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 164 and after the incident was 160 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microsoft Security Response Center and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Windows Zero-Day 'LegacyHive' Exploits User Profile Service for Privilege Escalation", has drawn attention.

A newly disclosed Windows zero-day vulnerability, dubbed *LegacyHive* (or *MSNightmare*), abuses the User Profile Service (*ProfSvc*) to enable local privilege escalation, allowing attackers to tamper with administrator accounts and execute arbitrary code with elevated permiss...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting All supported Windows desktop and server versions, and exposing Administrator’s application data and configurations (e.g., file associations, COM objects, shell extensions).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Monitor registry hive modifications and COM/object registration changes in privileged accounts.

The case underscores how Unpatched (Microsoft acknowledged but no CVE assigned), teams are taking away lessons such as The exploit highlights the risks of race conditions in Windows kernel impersonation and the need for vigilant monitoring of registry modifications in privileged accounts, and recommending next steps like Monitor registry hive modifications and COM/object registration changes in privileged accounts, Apply Microsoft patches once available and Restrict low-privileged user access to sensitive registry hives.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including abuses the User Profile Service (ProfSvc) to enable local privilege escalation, and exploits how ProfSvc loads and unloads user registry hives during logon/logoff and Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating enabling attackers to tamper with administrator accounts and execute arbitrary code with elevated permissions. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Event Triggered Execution: Component Object Model Hijacking (T1546.015) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including attackers can alter file associations, COM objects, or shell extensions in the admin’s hive, and hijacking a .txt file association to launch calc.exe and Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (T1547.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating embedding persistence mechanisms that activate during an admin’s normal login. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Modify Registry (T1112) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including mount another user’s UsrClass.dat registry hive into their own session, and alter file associations, COM objects, or shell extensions in the admin’s hive and Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating activity appearing as legitimate admin behavior, evading endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating requires prior access to a system and a non-admin account. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including execute arbitrary code with elevated permissions, and hijacking a .txt file association to launch calc.exe. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (95%)
Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (80%)
Persistence
Event Triggered Execution: Component Object Model Hijacking (90%)
Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder (70%)
Defense Evasion
Modify Registry (90%)
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (85%)
Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (85%)

Sources & References