Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Microsoft Security Response Center » MIC1776249547

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MIC1776249547)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-24
Company Score Before Incident555 / 1000
Company Score After Incident531 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMIC1776249547
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORLocal
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive data exfiltration possible
INCIDENT DATE13/04/2026
STATUSPatched

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Microsoft Security Response Center's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Microsoft Security Response Center Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microsoft Security Response Center breach identified under incident ID MIC1776249547.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microsoft Security Response Center's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-security-response-center, the number of followers: 54723, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 555 and after the incident was 531 with a difference of -24 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microsoft Security Response Center and their customers.

On 14 April 2026, Microsoft disclosed Privilege Escalation issues under the banner "Microsoft Patches Zero-Day Privilege Escalation Flaw in Defender Antimalware Platform".

On April 14, 2026, Microsoft released security updates to address a newly disclosed zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2026-33825) in its Defender Antimalware Platform.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows machines with Defender Antimalware Platform (versions up to 4.18.26020.6), and exposing Sensitive data exfiltration possible.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Security updates released (patch version 4.18.26030.3011), and began remediation that includes Automatic deployment of patches; verification via Windows Security or Antimalware Client Version checks, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure and advisory via Microsoft security updates.

The case underscores how Patched, and recommending next steps like Verify patch deployment via Windows Security or Antimalware Client Version; audit software distribution tools for compliance; monitor for exploitation attempts, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Administrators advised to verify updates and ensure compliance across networks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2026-33825) enables attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM-level and Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating insufficient access-control granularity (CWE-1220) in Defender’s user-mode binaries and kernel-mode drivers. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers could disable security tools once exploited. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating create administrative accounts with SYSTEM-level permissions and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating deploy persistent malware via Defender’s kernel-mode drivers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate sensitive data possible with SYSTEM-level access. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation requires only low privileges and no user interaction. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (95%)
Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (80%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (90%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (85%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Initial Access
Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (70%)

Sources & References