Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft Dynamics 365Microsoft Dynamics 365
VS
AgodaAgoda
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

16061 NE 36th Way, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.dynamics.com
560/1000Very Poor

Keep up on the latest news and events for Microsoft Dynamics 365, the only portfolio of intelligent business applications that gives you the agility to deliver operational excellence and delight every customer.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Agoda

Agoda

20 Cecil Street, #1401, Singapore, 049705, SG

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://careersatagoda.com/
722/1000Moderate

At Agoda, we bridge the world through travel. We aim to make it easy and rewarding for more travelers to explore and experience the amazing world we live in. We do so by enabling more people to see the world for less – with our best-value deals across our 6,000,000+ hot...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,913
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Agoda

Agoda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft Dynamics 365 has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Agoda has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft Dynamics 365 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Dynamics 365 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Agoda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agoda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALL1785522998
🔒 Incident : Breach
GEINUAMIC1770196655
Agoda

Agoda

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AGOBOO1776904233

FAQ

Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Agoda company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Agoda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Agoda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft Dynamics 365 or Agoda ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft Dynamics 365 or Agoda ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Agoda, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Agoda, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA