Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MicrofMicrof
VS
KBC Bank & VerzekeringKBC Bank & Verzekering
Microf

Microf

1000 Holcomb Woods Pkwy, Roswell, 30076, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.microf.com
634/1000Poor

Microf was established to accommodate the growing demand for more flexible options surrounding the replacement of a residential heating/cooling system. Our goal is to "restore the heating/cooling needs of the consumer with an affordable monthly payment"​ through our str...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:96
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

Havenlaan 2, 1000 Brussel, Brussels, BE, 1080

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kbc.be
775/1000Fair

Welkom op de officiële LinkedIn-pagina van KBC! Bekijk onze vacatures op de tab ‘Vacatures’. KBC is een geïntegreerde bank-verzekeraar die zich hoofdzakelijk richt op particulieren en privatebankingcliënten, en op kleine en middelgrote ondernemingen. KBC heeft een le...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13,414
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microf

Microf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KBC Bank & Verzekering in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Microf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KBC Bank & Verzekering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KBC Bank & Verzekering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microf

Microf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MIC1766850884
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microf company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microf and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microf and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microf or KBC Bank & Verzekering ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microf or KBC Bank & Verzekering ?
Between Microf and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microf and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8