Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Microcode Software Services, Inc. » MICCOM1786570654

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MICCOM1786570654)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-146
Company Score Before Incident749 / 1000
Company Score After Incident603 / 1000
Company LinkView Microcode Software Services, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMICCOM1786570654
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized server access
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII), medical...
INCIDENT DATE18/01/2026
STATUSCompleted (forensic investigation concluded)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Microcode Software Services, Inc.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Microcode Software Services, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microcode Software Services, Inc. breach identified under incident ID MICCOM1786570654.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microcode Software Services, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microcode-software-services, the number of followers: 1050, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 20 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 603 with a difference of -146 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microcode Software Services, Inc. and their customers.

On 30 July 2026, CommonSpirit Health disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "MicroCode Software Services Discloses Ransomware Breach Affecting CommonSpirit Health Data".

MicroCode Software Services Inc., an IT vendor for CommonSpirit Health, reported a data breach stemming from a ransomware attack that exposed sensitive medical malpractice insurance records.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Server hosting CommonSpirit Health’s database, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), medical malpractice insurance records, with nearly 4,096 records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Notification letters mailed to affected individuals, credit monitoring and fraud protection resources provided, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure to Washington Attorney General, notification letters to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Completed (forensic investigation concluded), teams are taking away lessons such as Highlights ongoing risks in third-party vendor security within the healthcare sector, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification letters with credit monitoring and fraud protection resources.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to MicroCode’s server hosting CommonSpirit Health’s database and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating reconnaissance period (Jan 19 - Apr 14, 2026) suggests prolonged access. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access detected over 3-month period (Jan 19 - Apr 14, 2026). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating prolonged unauthorized access to server suggests credential compromise. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access to server hosting CommonSpirit Health’s database. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack on April 14, 2026, compromised the system. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII (names, dates of birth) exposed; data exfiltration not explicitly denied. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical malpractice insurance records and PII compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 3-month unauthorized access period suggests evasion of detection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (60%)

Sources & References