What is the official website of Michigan Supreme Court ?

The official website of Michigan Supreme Court is http://courts.mi.gov.

What is Michigan Supreme Court's cybersecurity risk score?

Michigan Supreme Court has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 761 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Michigan Supreme Court experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Michigan Supreme Court been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Michigan Supreme Court comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Michigan Supreme Court comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Michigan Supreme Court is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Michigan Supreme Court is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Michigan Supreme Court operate in ?

Michigan Supreme Court operates primarily in the Administration of Justice industry.

How many employees does Michigan Supreme Court have ?

Michigan Supreme Court employs approximately 290 people worldwide.

Does Michigan Supreme Court own any subsidiaries ?

Michigan Supreme Court presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Michigan Supreme Court have ?

Michigan Supreme Court's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 16,374 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Michigan Supreme Court ?

Michigan Supreme Court is classified under the NAICS code 92211, which corresponds to Courts.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Michigan Supreme Court does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Michigan Supreme Court have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Michigan Supreme Court maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/michigan-supreme-court.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Michigan Supreme Court experienced ?

As of July 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Michigan Supreme Court has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Michigan Supreme Court have ?

Michigan Supreme Court has an estimated 376 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MSC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

761

/1000

Fair

786

/1000

Fair

Michigan Supreme Court Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mi.gov

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Supreme Court is Michigan's court of last resort, consisting of seven justices. Each year, the Supreme Court receives over 2,000 applications for leave to appeal from litigants primarily seeking review of decisions by the Michigan Court of Appeals. In addition to its judicial duties, the Supreme Court is responsible for the general administrative supervision of all courts in the state. The Supreme Court also establishes rules for practice and procedure in all courts.

MSC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MSC

Michigan Supreme Court CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

MSC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MSC

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Supreme Court in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Supreme Court in 2026.

Incident Types MSC vs Administration of Justice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Supreme Court in 2026.

Incident History - MSC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Michigan Supreme Court Subsidiaries

MSC

Administration of Justice

Website: http://courts.mi.gov

Company Size: 501-1,000 employees

State of MichiganGovernment Administration

Loading…

Michigan Supreme Court Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Michigan Supreme Court CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 22, 2026 01:26 AM

Mich. Justices Skeptical Of MSU Immunity Bid In Law Prof Suit

The Michigan Supreme Court seemed unlikely to let Michigan State University escape a lawsuit from two former professors at MSU College of...

Read Article

January 13, 2026 08:00 AM

Michigan Supreme Court considers rule to bar ICE civil arrests during court proceedings

The Michigan Supreme Court will host a public administrative hearing on Wednesday, Jan. 14 for a proposed court rule that would prohibit any...

Read Article

January 12, 2026 11:23 PM

High Court Declines To Hear Michigan Tax Foreclosure Case

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a property owner's case alleging that a Michigan county improperly kept the excess proceeds...

Read Article

January 12, 2026 10:04 PM

Justices Won't Look At Michigan's Foreclosure Sale Rule

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to review three cases that ask whether Michigan's process to claim surplus proceeds after a tax...

Read Article

December 19, 2025 08:00 AM

Michigan's 5 Biggest Court Rulings Of 2025

Michigan courts had a memorable year in 2025, issuing rulings that extended protections against automatic life sentences to young adults,...

Read Article

December 11, 2025 05:53 AM

Lynn A. Gandhi

Lynn A. Gandhi is a partner and business lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP and is a member of the Tax, Benefits & Estate Planning Practice.

Read Article

December 01, 2025 08:00 AM

Michigan Supreme Court Committee Scrubs DEI From Name, Duties

The Michigan Supreme Court rebranded its diversity, equity, and inclusion commission, with one of its co-chairing justices writing that the...

Read Article

November 20, 2025 08:00 AM

Michigan Supreme Court To Hear Court Funding Challenge

The Michigan Supreme Court will take up a challenge to a state law authorizing trial courts to collect fees from criminal defendants to fund...

Read Article

October 22, 2025 07:00 AM

E&E News: Tribes urge justices to leave Line 5 fight in state court

ENERGYWIRE | Ten tribal nations are calling on the nation's highest bench to reject Enbridge's efforts to move litigation over its aging...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-12484

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in keras-team/keras version 3.15.0 allows unsafe deserialization of attacker-controlled PyTorch pickle data through the public `keras.layers.TorchModuleWrapper.from_config` method. This method invokes `torch.load(..., weights_only=False)` without requiring an explicit unsafe opt-in, such as a `safe_mode=False` parameter. When called outside a `SafeModeScope(True)` context, the absence of an ambient safe mode state permits unsafe deserialization by default. This issue can lead to arbitrary code execution if untrusted Keras layer configurations are processed using this method. The vulnerability arises because the method does not enforce safe deserialization practices unless explicitly guarded by Keras safe mode.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://huntr.com/bounties/ab14df49-13b5-4442-b754-3189430bfa28

CVE-2026-64186

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommu/amd: Remove latent out-of-bounds access in IOMMU debugfs In iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write(), the variables dbg_mmio_offset and dbg_cap_offset are declared as int. However, they are populated using kstrtou32_from_user(). If a user provides a sufficiently large value, it can become a negative integer. Prior to this patch, the AMD IOMMU debugfs implementation was already protected by different mechanisms. 1. #define OFS_IN_SZ 8 ensures the user string <= 8 bytes, so e.g. 0xffffffff isn't a valid input. if (cnt > OFS_IN_SZ) return -EINVAL; 2. Implicit type promotion in iommu_mmio_write(), dbg_mmio_offset is int and iommu->mmio_phys_end is u64 if (dbg_mmio_offset > iommu->mmio_phys_end - sizeof(u64)) return -EINVAL; 3. The show handlers would currently catch the negative number and refuse to perform the read. Replace kstrtou32_from_user() with kstrtos32_from_user() to parse the input, and check for negative values to explicitly prevent out-of-bounds memory accesses directly in iommu_mmio_write() and iommu_capability_write().

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64185

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: don't remove existing directory on update failure When sysfs_update_group() is called for a named group and create_files() fails (e.g. -ENOMEM), internal_create_group() calls kernfs_remove(kn) on the group directory. In the update path, kn was obtained via kernfs_find_and_get() and refers to a directory that already existed before this call. Removing it silently destroys a sysfs group that the caller did not create. Only remove the directory if we created it ourselves. On update failure the directory remains as it is left empty by remove_files() inside create_files(), but can be repopulated by a retry.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64184

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: call missing mem_cgroup_iter_break() damon_sysfs_memcg_path_to_id() breaks mem_cgroup_iter() loop without calling mem_cgroup_iter_break(). This leaks the cgroup reference. Fix the issue by calling mem_cgroup_iter_break() before the break. The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64183

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.

Published

Date2026-07-19

Updated

Date2026-07-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…