What is the official website of Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. ?

The official website of Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is http://www.mfhs.org.

What is Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc.'s cybersecurity risk score?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 689 out of 1000, indicating a Weak security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. operate in ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. operates primarily in the Health and Human Services industry.

How many employees does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. employs approximately 158 people worldwide.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. own any subsidiaries ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc.'s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 3,625 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. is classified under the NAICS code 923, which corresponds to Administration of Human Resource Programs.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mfhspa.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. experienced ?

As of August 11, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. have ?

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. has an estimated 591 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Cyber Attack.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MFHSI

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

689

/1000

Weak

714

/1000

Moderate

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mfhs.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

As a private non-profit health and human services organization, MFHS works to meet the health and nutrition needs of Northeastern Pennsylvania’s women, children and families with information, education, and quality care. Founded in 1971, MFHS has been preventing disease, promoting wellness, and empowering individuals to realize the promise of better health for over forty years. Today, we oversee and support a network of health and nutrition centers in 16 Pennsylvania counties, serving over 100,000 women, men and children annually through five core programs: - WIC (Women, Infants and Children) Nutrition Program - Reproductive Health Services - Cancer Screening Services - The Nurse-Family Partnership Home Visit Program - Pregnancy

MFHSI A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MFHSI

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Maternal And Family...

Cyber Attack

4/2022

MFH743082025

Maternal And Family...

Ransomware

100

8/2021

MFH559072725

Loading…

A.I.

MFHSI Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MFHSI

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incident Types MFHSI vs Health and Human Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History - MFHSI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MFHSI

Health and Human Services

Website: http://www.mfhs.org

Company Size: 51-200 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Maternal And Family Health Services, Inc. CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 19, 2026 07:00 AM

70 Companies With the Best Maternity and Parental Leave Policies

Paid parental leave gives new parents the time and space to prioritize caring for the latest addition to their family without having to...

Read Article

March 15, 2026 07:00 AM

LEGISLATIVE ROUNDUP: Over 3 years, Pa. invests more than $12M to help keep moms and babies healthy

Since January 2023, the Shapiro Administration has invested $12.3 million in maternal and child health initiatives that are delivering real...

Read Article

February 26, 2026 08:00 AM

Trends In Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

Our healthcare data breach statistics clearly show an upward trend in data breaches since 2009, when OCR first started publishing data...

Read Article

January 28, 2026 08:00 AM

HIPAA Violation Cases - Updated 2026

MMG Fusion. MMG Fusion, a provider of software solutions to oral healthcare providers, was investigated by OCR in response to a complaint...

Read Article

September 25, 2025 07:00 AM

Cyberattack on Coos County Family Health Services Exposed Patient Data

Data breaches have recently been announced by Coos County Family Health Services in New Hampshire, Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing in North...

Read Article

August 07, 2025 07:00 AM

Family Health Center; NorthCare Settle Data Breach Lawsuits

Settlements have received preliminary approval from the courts to resolve class action data breach litigation against Family Health Center...

Read Article

January 28, 2025 08:00 AM

Which Federal Programs Are Under Scrutiny? The Budget Office Named 2,600 of Them. (Published 2025)

The Trump administration ordered temporary freezes in funding for programs spanning virtually every part of the government.

Read Article

August 18, 2023 07:00 AM

The Power of Family Integrated Care in the NICU

Family Integrated Care (FiCare) is the newest model of neonatal care aimed at reducing the NICU infant-parent separation by making parents critical members of...

Read Article

January 09, 2023 08:00 AM

Hive claims stealing Consulate Health data; provider reports vendor incident

The Hive ransomware threat group claims to have stolen 550 GB of data from Consulate Health Care. The actors' dark web posting appeared...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8718

SUMMARY

tls_opt_dtls_peer_connection_id_value_get() in subsys/net/lib/sockets/sockets_tls.c, which handles getsockopt(SOL_TLS, TLS_DTLS_PEER_CID_VALUE), passed the caller-supplied optval directly to mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() without verifying the buffer was at least MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX (default 32) bytes. mbedtls_ssl_get_peer_cid() copies the peer-negotiated DTLS Connection ID (length 1..MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX) into that buffer without a destination-size parameter, so a caller-supplied optlen smaller than the CID causes a write of up to 31 bytes past the buffer end. In CONFIG_USERSPACE builds the getsockopt syscall verifier (z_vrfy_zsock_getsockopt) bounce-buffers the user's optval into a kernel allocation of exactly optlen bytes (k_usermode_alloc_from_copy -> z_thread_malloc), so an unprivileged user thread that passes a small optlen on a connected DTLS socket with Connection ID enabled induces a kernel-heap buffer overflow, with the overflowing content being the remote peer's CID. The defect requires CONFIG_MBEDTLS_SSL_DTLS_CONNECTION_ID, an established DTLS session with a negotiated peer CID, and (for the kernel-crossing case) CONFIG_USERSPACE. Introduced when the TLS_DTLS_CID option was added (v3.5.0). The fix rejects callers whose optlen is below MBEDTLS_SSL_CID_OUT_LEN_MAX with -EINVAL.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.8

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-48161

SUMMARY

react18-use is a React 19 use hook shim. Between 2026-05-19 01:07:01 and 2026-05-19 15:20:43, the default branch contained malicious commits 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 through 7b79148d1495a2505f9277da295a98cf176f4496 that executed remote attacker-controlled code on developer machines during `npm install`. The commits were removed by force-push, but local clones, forks, and direct-SHA URLs may still contain them, and `npm install` against an affected checkout will still execute the code today. The package was not published to npm. `src/install.js` was added and wired into the `postinstall` script. It fetched a JavaScript payload from an attacker-controlled HTTPS endpoint (configurable via an environment variable), disabled TLS verification, and evaluated the response as code with `require` available. Execution was deliberately skipped on CI and cloud/serverless environments, targeting developer workstations. The second-stage payload was attacker-hosted and cannot be reconstructed. Assume full compromise of anything reachable from a Node process with the user's permissions. Those who ran `npm install` against an affected checkout on a developer machine on or after 2026-05-19 01:07:01 should treat the machine as compromised, rotate every credential the machine could reach, audit account activity since 2026-05-19 01:07:01, and clean local clones.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/dai-shi/react18-use/security/advisories/GHSA-32xh-vg5f-64fm

CVE-2026-11812

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub management subsystem (subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c) drives every update operation through a single file-scope ctx structure that holds the CoAP block context, payload buffer, status code, socket, and a one-element poll-fd array fds[1]. Access to ctx was not serialized, and prepare_fds() wrote ctx.fds[ctx.nfds] and incremented ctx.nfds with no bounds check. Two independent paths mutate ctx concurrently: the background autohandler running on the system workqueue, and user-triggered operations reached through the updatehub run shell command, direct API calls, or — since the operations are exposed as syscalls — userspace threads. When a second flow enters prepare_fds() while ctx.nfds is already 1, the write lands one element past the array; by struct layout it overlaps the adjacent ctx.sock/ctx.nfds members. More broadly, the unsynchronized sharing lets two flows interleave connection setup and teardown, double-closing a socket descriptor or scribbling the shared buffers. The result is corruption of the update subsystem's internal state and denial of service of the firmware-update path; the out-of-bounds write is contained within the ctx structure and there is no demonstrated path to memory outside it or to code execution. Triggering requires a local actor able to invoke update operations (or, with CONFIG_USERSPACE, an unprivileged userspace thread) and to win a timing race against the background handler; remote peers cannot control the race timing. The fix serializes the entry points with a mutex and adds a bounds check to prepare_fds().

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-11811

SUMMARY

The UpdateHub over-the-air update client's start_coap_client() in subsys/mgmt/updatehub/updatehub.c leaks the CoAP/DTLS socket descriptor on its connection-setup failure paths. The shared error: cleanup gated socket closing on a ret > 0 flag, but ret was set to -1 immediately after the socket was created, so when zsock_setsockopt() (DTLS) or zsock_connect() subsequently failed the gate was false and cleanup_connection() was never called. The open descriptor in the global ctx.sock was then overwritten by the next attempt, permanently leaking it from the socket / net_context pool until reboot. The failing setup path is reached every time the OTA client tries to contact the UpdateHub server and the connection cannot be established — driven automatically by the periodic autohandler() poll (and on demand via the updatehub_probe()/updatehub_update() API or the updatehub run shell command). The DTLS handshake/connect outcome is influenceable by a network or on-path attacker who drops, resets, or otherwise disrupts traffic to the server, and also fails naturally whenever the server is unreachable. Each failed attempt permanently leaks one descriptor; once the shared socket pool is exhausted, networking degrades device-wide until the device is rebooted, a denial-of-service condition. Severity is low because the leak rate is bounded by the configured OTA poll interval (default once per 24 hours), the effect is gradual and recovered by reboot, and only builds with the UpdateHub client enabled are affected. There is no memory-corruption, information-disclosure, or authentication impact.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2025-30241

SUMMARY

Certain web interface components in affected TP-Link Aginet devices do not validate and sanitize user-supplied input properly before passing it to system-level command execution functions. An authenticated adjacent attacker may inject specially crafted input to execute arbitrary operation system commands with elevated privileges. Successful exploitation may allow execution of arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full device compromise.

Published

Date2026-08-10

Updated

Date2026-08-10

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.tp-link.com/us/support/faq/5239/

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…