What is Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County's cybersecurity risk score?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 761 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County operate in ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County operates primarily in the Ground Passenger Transportation industry.

How many employees does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County employs approximately 1,534 people worldwide.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County own any subsidiaries ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 11,138 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County is classified under the NAICS code 485, which corresponds to Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/metropolitan-transit-authority-of-harris-county.

Does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/metropolitan-transit-authority-of-harris-county.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County experienced ?

As of June 17, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County have ?

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County has an estimated 162 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MTAHC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

761

/1000

Fair

786

/1000

Fair

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ridemetro.org

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Texas State Legislature authorized the creation of local transit authorities in 1973. In 1978, Houston-area voters created METRO and approved a one-cent sales tax to support its operations. METRO opened for business in January 1979. The Authority has transformed a broken bus fleet into a regional multimodal transportation system. Communities that are part of the METRO area include the cities of Houston, Bellaire, Bunker Hill Village, El Lago, Hedwig Village, Hilshire Village, Humble, Hunters Creek, Katy, Missouri City, Piney Point, Southside Place, Spring Valley, Taylor Lake Village and West University Place. Major portions of unincorporated Harris County are also included.

MTAHC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MTAHC

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

MTAHC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MTAHC

Incidents vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County in 2026.

Incident Types MTAHC vs Ground Passenger Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County in 2026.

Incident History - MTAHC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MTAHC

Ground Passenger Transportation

Website: http://www.RideMETRO.org/

Company Size: 1,534

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Similar Companies

Lyft

lyft.com

Whether it’s an everyday commute or a journey that changes everything, Lyft is driven by our purpose: to serve and connect. In 2012, Lyft was founded as one of the first ridesharing communities in the United States. Now, millions of drivers have chosen to earn on billions of rides. Lyft offers rideshare, bikes, and scooters all in one app — for a more connected world, with transportation for everyone.

Loading…

NEWS

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

October 09, 2025 07:00 AM

In Harris County, Texas, a Diverse Approach to Cybersecurity

IT leaders in the state's most populous county said they will utilize new Texas Cyber Command services after a shift in national support,...

Read Article

July 15, 2025 07:00 AM

What It Takes to Stop the Next Salt Typhoon

Instead of cutting U.S. cyber defenses, the Trump administration must adopt a robust cyber strategy to thwart threats like Salt Typhoon.

Read Article

June 30, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity

The Department of Homeland Security and its components play a lead role in strengthening cybersecurity resilience across the nation and sectors.

Read Article

June 18, 2025 12:19 PM

Transportation trends 2022–23

Public sector leaders have a golden opportunity to use IIJA and IRA funds to reshape the future of public transportation in the United States,...

Read Article

May 07, 2025 07:00 AM

Appropriations panel chair asks Noem for more budget information

The chairman of a House Appropriations panel told Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Tuesday that he would welcome more justification for the Trump...

Read Article

November 17, 2024 08:00 AM

Managing Cyber Risk With USCG's New Maritime Security Directive

In this article Michael DeVolld, Maritime Transportation System (MTS) Cybersecurity Lead at ABS Consulting looks at the potential...

Read Article

October 31, 2024 07:00 AM

As presidential election looms, disparate approaches to cyber policy come into focus

Government officials and security leaders are hoping the nation's need for cyber resilience will stand on bipartisan cooperation and transcend partisan...

Read Article

July 19, 2024 07:00 AM

Global tech outage hits airlines, banks, health care and public transit

A defective update from U.S. cybersecurity software company CrowdStrike crashed Microsoft Windows systems around the globe Friday.

Read Article

July 19, 2024 07:00 AM

Houston airports, Texas DPS experiencing interruptions due to global tech outage

A global IT outage was causing flight delays out of George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston Friday morning amid mounting reports of...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-48777

SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

Published

Date2026-06-16

Updated

Date2026-06-16

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-47750

SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

Published

Date2026-06-16

Updated

Date2026-06-16

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-47747

SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

Published

Date2026-06-16

Updated

Date2026-06-16

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-46448

SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

Published

Date2026-06-16

Updated

Date2026-06-16

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

2.5

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-22313

SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

Published

Date2026-06-16

Updated

Date2026-06-16

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

https://www.cvcn.gov.it/cvcn/cve/CVE-2026-22313

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…