Comparison Overview
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group
Bld. Timisoara, nr. 26, Bucuresti, Sector 6, undefined, undefined, RO
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Noi suntem MEGA IMAGE, brandul de supermarket care te inspiră să trăiești așa cum îți place Facem parte din Grupul Ahold Delhaize, retailer internațional ce operează în prezent în Europa, Statele Unite și Asia. În România, suntem unul dintre cele mai mari lanțuri de sup...

Bath & Body Works
Columbus, Ohio, US, 43068
Last Update: 14/09/2026
We were founded on a simple idea: to make the world a brighter, happier place through the power of fragrance. As we've grown, so has our purpose and today, we help the world live more fully through the power of fragrance. We’re a team that cares about our customers and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group







Bath & Body Works






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bath & Body Works in 2026.
Incident History - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bath & Body Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bath & Body Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Bath & Body Works
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.