Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize GroupMEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group
VS
Bath & Body WorksBath & Body Works
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Bld. Timisoara, nr. 26, Bucuresti, Sector 6, undefined, undefined, RO

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mega-image.ro
778/1000Fair

Noi suntem MEGA IMAGE, brandul de supermarket care te inspiră să trăiești așa cum îți place Facem parte din Grupul Ahold Delhaize, retailer internațional ce operează în prezent în Europa, Statele Unite și Asia. În România, suntem unul dintre cele mai mari lanțuri de sup...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,586
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

Columbus, Ohio, US, 43068

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
767/1000Fair

We were founded on a simple idea: to make the world a brighter, happier place through the power of fragrance. As we've grown, so has our purpose and today, we help the world live more fully through the power of fragrance. We’re a team that cares about our customers and...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:33,374
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bath & Body Works in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bath & Body Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bath & Body Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAT545072925

FAQ

Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Bath & Body Works, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Bath & Body Works, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Bath & Body Works ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group or Bath & Body Works ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Bath & Body Works, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MEGA IMAGE - Ahold Delhaize Group and Bath & Body Works, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9