Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » MedPeds » MED1773772525

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MED1773772525)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-80
Company Score Before Incident821 / 1000
Company Score After Incident741 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMED1773772525
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED400 GB of sensitive information
INCIDENT DATE01/09/2025
STATUSOngoing (law firm investigation)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of MedPeds's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts MedPeds Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MedPeds breach identified under incident ID MED1773772525.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MedPeds's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/medpeds, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 37 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 821 and after the incident was 741 with a difference of -80 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MedPeds and their customers.

On 16 March 2026, MedPeds Associates of Sarasota disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "MedPeds Associates of Sarasota Hit by Ransomware Attack, Exposing Data of Over 21,000 Patients".

On September 2, 2025, MedPeds Associates of Sarasota, a Florida-based medical practice specializing in preventive care and chronic disease management, detected a ransomware attack on its computer systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 400 GB of sensitive information, with nearly 21,430 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notifications sent to affected individuals on March 16, 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing (law firm investigation), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notifications sent to affected individuals on March 16, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating detected a ransomware attack on its computer systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating offers in-person and telehealth services, including a patient portal. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bEAST ransomware group later claimed responsibility. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating patient portal for virtual visits and billing. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 400 GB of sensitive information exfiltrated. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bEAST ransomware group encrypted the organization’s data and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption by ransomware. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating patient medical records and PII compromised. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 21,430 people impacted, including names, DOB, addresses. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 400 GB of sensitive information exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating patient medical records compromised. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data posted on the dark web. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 400 GB of data posted on the dark web. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating bEAST ransomware group encrypted the organization’s data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)

Sources & References