Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MED1772360628)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of MediTechSafe, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts MediTechSafe, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MediTechSafe, Inc. breach identified under incident ID MED1772360628.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MediTechSafe, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/meditechsafe, the number of followers: 392, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 9 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 662 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MediTechSafe, Inc. and their customers.
Vastaamo Psychotherapy Center recently reported "Finland’s Vastaamo Psychotherapy Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
In 2018, Finnish hacker Julius Kivimäki infiltrated the servers of Vastaamo Psychotherapy Center, a major mental health provider with dozens of clinics across Finland.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Vastaamo Psychotherapy Center servers, and exposing Highly sensitive patient data, including therapy session notes, with nearly 33,000 records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscored the severe risks of inadequate cybersecurity in healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations. It highlighted the need for stronger protections for sensitive mental health data.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrated the servers of Vastaamo Psychotherapy Center and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on initial access vector, but likely exploited weak credentials. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate cybersecurity measures likely enabled credential theft. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed highly sensitive data...therapy session notes and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating breach exposed...confidential therapy session notes from servers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes, 33,000 records exposed and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfil method, but likely used web-based channels. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of encryption, but ransom demand implies potential threat and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of defacement, but severe reputational impact noted. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrated servers likely required lateral movement. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- MediTechSafe, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/meditechsafe/incident/MED1772360628
- MediTechSafe, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/meditechsafe
- MediTechSafe, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/med1772360628-vastaamo-psychotherapy-center-breach-january-2018/
- MediTechSafe, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/meditechsafe/history
- MediTechSafe, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/91498632/teenage-hackers-are-on-the-rise-theyre-more-dangerous-than-you-think
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf