Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MED1772728377)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of MediMap's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts MediMap Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MediMap breach identified under incident ID MED1772728377.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MediMap's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/medi-map, the number of followers: 869, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 22 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 667 with a difference of -93 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MediMap and their customers.
On 22 February 2026, Manage My Health (MMH) disclosed Ransomware and Data Tampering issues under the banner "Major Health Data Breaches in New Zealand (2025-2026)".
New Zealand experienced two significant cyberattacks targeting healthcare systems, exposing critical gaps in the country’s privacy protections.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Manage My Health (MMH) and MediMap, and exposing Medical records, patient personal information, with nearly 120,000 (MMH) records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as New Zealand’s Privacy Act 2020 lacks sufficient enforcement mechanisms, such as civil penalties for breaches, leaving the country vulnerable to cyberattacks. The breaches highlight the need for legislative reform to align with global standards like GDPR, and recommending next steps like Strengthen cybersecurity laws, introduce civil penalties for privacy violations, and explore new offenses for mishandling illegally obtained data. Improve enforcement mechanisms under the Privacy Act 2020.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including patient portal used by public health organizations, and mediMap portal used by aged-care homes and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized actors tampered with patient records, and accessed and exfiltrated medical records. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attackers accessed and exfiltrated medical records. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including unauthorized actors tampered with patient records, and accessed and exfiltrated medical records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating medical records of approximately 120,000 patients exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating patient portal used by public health organizations compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including ransomware attackers...exfiltrated medical records, and threatened to leak them on the dark web and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to leak them on the dark web. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actors tampered with patient records, altering names, birthdates, Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attackers accessed and exfiltrated medical records, and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including marking living patients as deceased, and altering names, birthdates. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actors tampered with patient records without detection and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attackers accessed and exfiltrated medical records. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- MediMap Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/medi-map/incident/MED1772728377
- MediMap CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/medi-map
- MediMap Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/med1772728377-medimap-cyber-attack-february-2026/
- MediMap CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/medi-map/history
- MediMap CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://iapp.org/news/a/calls-to-strengthen-new-zealand-s-privacy-act-grow-amid-an-increasing-number-of-major-breaches
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf