What is the official website of McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. ?

The official website of McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is https://www.mcmillanmetro.com/.

What is McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C.'s cybersecurity risk score?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 727 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. experienced?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. operate in ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. employs approximately 38 people worldwide.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. own any subsidiaries ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C.'s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 253 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mcmillanmetro.

How many cybersecurity incidents has McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. experienced ?

As of July 26, 2026, Rankiteo reports that McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. have ?

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. has an estimated 16,187 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

MMFP

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

727

/1000

Moderate

752

/1000

Fair

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

mcmillanmetro.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. is a leading law firm based in Potomac, Maryland, serving those across the D.C. metro area. The firm has created a diverse practice that includes corporate & business law, estate planning, real estate law, partnership planning, family law & more. McMillan Metro Fearber offers a client-first approach & skilled counseling that gets results.

MMFP A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

MMFP

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

McMillan Metro Faer...

Breach

9/2021

MCM042091825

Loading…

A.I.

MMFP Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for MMFP

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. in 2026.

Incident Types MMFP vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. in 2026.

Incident History - MMFP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. Subsidiaries

Parent Company

MMFP

Law Practice

Website: https://www.mcmillanmetro.com/

Company Size: 38

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

McMillan Metro Faerber, P.C. CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-10681

SUMMARY

In Zephyr's userspace dynamic-objects subsystem, thread_idx_alloc() in kernel/userspace/userspace.c allocated a new thread permission index from the global _thread_idx_map[] bitmap without holding lists_lock. On SMP systems, two user-mode threads invoking the k_object_alloc(K_OBJ_THREAD) syscall concurrently can both observe the same low free bit, perform the same non-atomic RMW to clear it, and return the identical tidx. The two newly created K_OBJ_THREAD objects are then assigned the same thread_id, so the two user threads alias a single bit position in every kernel object's perms[] bitfield: any subsequent grant of access on a kernel object to one thread is implicitly a grant to the other, defeating userspace ACL isolation. A secondary lost-update window between the unlocked &=~BIT() in alloc and the locked |= BIT() in thread_idx_free() can also leak entries from the thread-index pool. The defect is reachable from any user-mode thread via the unrestricted __syscall k_object_alloc and is gated on CONFIG_USERSPACE, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_OBJECTS, and CONFIG_SMP. The flaw was introduced when the per-thread permission index was added in 2018 and is present in every release up to and including v4.4.0. Fixed by holding lists_lock across the bitmap RMW and the permissions clear (and inlining the obj_list traversal that previously took the lock itself).

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

5.5

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66013

SUMMARY

OpenRemote before 1.26.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the console registration API that allows unauthenticated attackers to update existing console assets by supplying a known asset identifier. Attackers can overwrite push notification tokens and console metadata without authentication or ownership validation, redirecting notifications or denying delivery to legitimate consoles.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66012

SUMMARY

SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)

cvss3

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66011

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64529

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - remove unused character device and IOCTLs The QAT driver exposes a character device (qat_adf_ctl) with IOCTLs for device configuration, start, stop, status query and enumeration. These IOCTLs are not part of any public uAPI header and have no known in-tree or out-of-tree users. Device lifecycle is already managed via sysfs. The ioctl interface also increases the attack surface and is the subject of a number of bug reports. Remove the character device, the IOCTL definitions, and the related data structures (adf_dev_status_info, adf_user_cfg_key_val, adf_user_cfg_section, adf_user_cfg_ctl_data). Drop the now-unused adf_cfg_user.h header and strip adf_ctl_drv.c down to the minimal module_init/module_exit hooks for workqueue, AER, and crypto/compression algorithm registration. Clean up leftover dead code that was only reachable from the removed IOCTL paths: adf_cfg_del_all(), adf_devmgr_verify_id(), adf_devmgr_get_num_dev(), adf_devmgr_get_dev_by_id(), adf_get_vf_real_id() and the unused ADF_CFG macros. Additionally, drop the entry associated to QAT IOCTLs in ioctl-number.rst.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…