Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

McKinsey DigitalMcKinsey Digital
VS
CapitaCapita
McKinsey Digital

McKinsey Digital

55 E 52nd St, New York, 10022, US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile

We drive transformation and build businesses by bringing together the capabilities needed to help organizations grow and thrive in the digital age. We help our clients: > Harness the power of data and artificial intelligence > Modernize core technology, and capitali...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Capita

Capita

2 Kingdom Street, First Floor, London, England, GB, W2 6BD

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.capita.com
618/1000Poor

Capita is an outsourcer, helping clients across the public and private sectors run complex business processes more efficiently, creating better consumer experiences. Operating across eight countries, Capita’s 34,000 colleagues support primarily UK and European clients ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:25,516
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
McKinsey Digital

McKinsey Digital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capita

Capita

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McKinsey Digital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capita in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - McKinsey Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McKinsey Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
McKinsey Digital

McKinsey Digital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Capita

Capita

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAP5833058101525
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
CAP93224923
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAP2002120101625

FAQ

Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between McKinsey Digital company and Capita company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between McKinsey Digital and Capita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between McKinsey Digital and Capita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - McKinsey Digital or Capita ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - McKinsey Digital or Capita ?
Between McKinsey Digital and Capita, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between McKinsey Digital and Capita, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA