Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MAS IndiaMAS India
VS
Tommy HilfigerTommy Hilfiger
MAS India

MAS India

518-520 Thirupporur Kottamedu High Road, Nandhivaram Village, Guduvanchery 603 202, Chennai, IN

Last Update: 08/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.masholdings.com/
760/1000Fair

Embarking on a new chapter, MAS extends its legacy to empower communities in India. As India gears up to become the third largest economy by 2030, We are aiming to propel the country’s growth aspirations and become a significant contributor for textile and apparel indus...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tommy Hilfiger

Tommy Hilfiger

Danzigerkade 165, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1013

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tommy.com
784/1000Fair

TOMMY HILFIGER is one of the world’s leading designer lifestyle brands creating a platform that inspires the modern American spirit, while committing to wasting nothing and welcoming all. Founded in 1985, Tommy Hilfiger delivers premium styling, quality and value to c...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:12,447
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MAS India

MAS India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tommy Hilfiger

Tommy Hilfiger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAS India in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tommy Hilfiger in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MAS India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAS India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tommy Hilfiger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tommy Hilfiger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MAS India

MAS India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tommy Hilfiger

Tommy Hilfiger

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOM2720323

FAQ

Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MAS India company and Tommy Hilfiger company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MAS India and Tommy Hilfiger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MAS India and Tommy Hilfiger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MAS India or Tommy Hilfiger ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MAS India or Tommy Hilfiger ?
Between MAS India and Tommy Hilfiger, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MAS India and Tommy Hilfiger, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA