Comparison Overview
Mars Snacking

Mars Snacking
1132 W. Blackhawk St., Chicago, 60642, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Mars Snacking is the world’s leading manufacturer of chocolate, chewing gum, mints, and fruity confections. Mars Wrigley employs approximately 34,000 Associates globally and has operations in approximately 90 countries. Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, USA, Mars Snac...

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
1000 Stanley Drive, New Britain, CT, US, 06053
Last Update: 01/04/2026
For the builders and protectors, for the makers and explorers, for those shaping and reshaping our world through hard work and inspiration, Stanley Black & Decker provides the tools and innovative solutions you can trust to get the job done—and we have since 1843. You ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mars Snacking







Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mars Snacking in 2026.
Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Mars Snacking (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mars Snacking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mars Snacking

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.