Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MAR1770244909)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Marquis Technologies's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Marquis Technologies Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Marquis Technologies breach identified under incident ID MAR1770244909.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Marquis Technologies's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/marquis-technologies, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 98 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 785 and after the incident was 714 with a difference of -71 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Marquis Technologies and their customers.
Marquis recently reported "Ransomware Breach Traces Back to Exposed Firewall Configurations at FinTech Firm", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
In early February 2026, financial technology provider Marquis confirmed a ransomware and data breach stemming from misconfigured SonicWall firewall systems and unsecured backup data.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Firewall systems, backup data, network infrastructure, and exposing True.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The incident reveals critical gaps in 'set-and-forget' perimeter security. Firewalls accumulate unmanaged exceptions, temporary rules, unprotected backups, and administrative credentials over time. Traditional alerting systems frequently miss such activity, as it mimics legitimate administrative behavior until encryption or exfiltration begins. Modern defenses must treat firewalls as dynamic sources of behavioral intelligence, correlating logs with network flows, endpoint activity, and user behavior to detect anomalies before damage occurs, and recommending next steps like Treat firewalls as dynamic sources of behavioral intelligence, correlate logs with network flows, endpoint activity, and user behavior to detect anomalies. Continuously scrutinize perimeter controls and avoid assumptions of safety regarding backups, administrative access, and perimeter defenses.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited long-standing vulnerabilities in SonicWall firewall systems and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating leveraged exposed firewall configurations, misconfigured SonicWall systems. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Network Information (T1590) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating harvested intelligence on network structure, segmentation, and security controls and Gather Victim Host Information (T1592) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed configuration files, weak monitoring, legacy firewall controls. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating administrative credentials accumulated over time in firewalls and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed configuration files leveraged for access. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypassed defenses by mimicking legitimate administrative behavior and Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unchecked trust in legacy firewall controls, administrative credentials. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating gained access via exposed firewall configurations, network segmentation. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating harvested intelligence on network structure, security controls. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating deploy ransomware undetected, data encryption confirmed and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unsecured backup data exploited in the breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in ransomware breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Marquis Technologies Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/marquis-technologies/incident/MAR1770244909
- Marquis Technologies CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/marquis-technologies
- Marquis Technologies Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/mar1770244909-marquis-ransomware-february-2026/
- Marquis Technologies CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/marquis-technologies/history
- Marquis Technologies CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://securityboulevard.com/2026/02/significant-ransomware-firewall-misconfiguration-breach/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf