Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Marquis » MARBLA1767622189

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MARBLA1767622189)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-98
Company Score Before Incident363 / 1000
Company Score After Incident265 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMARBLA1767622189
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-Party Vendor Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of members
INCIDENT DATE30/11/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Marquis's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Marquis Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Marquis breach identified under incident ID MARBLA1767622189.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Marquis's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/marquis-software-solutions, the number of followers: 3020, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 309 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 363 and after the incident was 265 with a difference of -98 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Marquis and their customers.

Blaze Credit Union recently reported "Blaze Credit Union Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A data breach at Marquis Software Solutions, a third-party vendor providing services to financial institutions, has potentially exposed personal information of more than 235,000 Blaze Credit Union members.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information of members, with nearly 235,000 records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services for affected members, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifying affected members via mailed letters in early December; urging members to monitor accounts and credit reports.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Members should monitor accounts for suspicious activity, watch for phishing attempts, and review credit reports regularly for unauthorized accounts, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Members notified via letters; urged to monitor accounts and credit reports.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including third-Party Vendor Compromise as attack_vector, and marquis Software Solutions, a third-party vendor. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exposed the personal information of over 235,000 members and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach at Marquis Software Solutions with high-volume records (235,000). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of misuse or attempted misuse (implies data may have been exfiltrated but not altered), Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no mention of ransomware or encryption in incident, and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of members exposed (potential for misuse). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor compromise likely involved access to cloud/financial systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-Party Vendor Compromise suggests abuse of legitimate access and Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating watch for phishing attempts implies potential follow-up attacks. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (95%)
Exfiltration
Data from Cloud Storage (70%)
Automated Exfiltration (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (10%)
Stored Data Manipulation (20%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)
Email Hiding Rules (40%)