Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Marks and SpencerMarks and Spencer
VS
Bath & Body WorksBath & Body Works
Marks and Spencer

Marks and Spencer

Waterside House, London, W2 1NW, GB

Last Update: 07/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://jobs.marksandspencer.com/
100/1000Critical

At M&S, we're dedicated to being the most trusted retailer, prioritising quality and delivering value. Every day, we bring the magic of M&S to our customers, whenever, wherever and however they want to shop with us. For over a century, we've set the standard, doing the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:40,198
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

Columbus, Ohio, US, 43068

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bbwinc.com/about-us
751/1000Fair

We were founded on a simple idea: to make the world a brighter, happier place through the power of fragrance. As we've grown, so has our purpose and today, we help the world live more fully through the power of fragrance. We’re a team that cares about our customers and...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:33,374
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Marks and Spencer

Marks and Spencer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Marks and Spencer has 278.38% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bath & Body Works in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Marks and Spencer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marks and Spencer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bath & Body Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bath & Body Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Marks and Spencer

Marks and Spencer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARHARLEV1786113277
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JAGMAR1784183368
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MARVEN1777695899
Bath & Body Works

Bath & Body Works

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAT545072925

FAQ

Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Marks and Spencer company and Bath & Body Works company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Marks and Spencer and Bath & Body Works, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Marks and Spencer and Bath & Body Works, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Marks and Spencer or Bath & Body Works ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Marks and Spencer or Bath & Body Works ?
Between Marks and Spencer and Bath & Body Works, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Marks and Spencer and Bath & Body Works, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES