Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Markitforce POS LogisticsMarkitforce POS Logistics
VS
CEVA LogisticsCEVA Logistics
Markitforce POS Logistics

Markitforce POS Logistics

23 Fiveways Boulevard, Melbourne, 3173, AU

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Part of WPP AUNZ, Markitforce is an ACTIVE Display Group brand committed to the very latest in innovation and technology to ensure our clients the best retail point of sale & product logistical management and solutions. Founded in 2001, Markitforce is quality endorsed -...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

10, Place de la Joliette, Marseille, 13002, FR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.cevalogistics.com
597/1000Very Poor

CEVA provides world-class supply chain solutions for large and medium-size national and multinational companies across the globe. As an industry leader, CEVA offers customers complete supply chain design and implementation in contract logistics and freight management, a...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:69,342
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Markitforce POS Logistics

Markitforce POS Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Markitforce POS Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

CEVA Logistics has 390.2% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Markitforce POS Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Markitforce POS Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CEVA Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEVA Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Markitforce POS Logistics

Markitforce POS Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CEVA Logistics

CEVA Logistics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEV1786152029
🔒 Incident : Breach
BOLCEV1786004807
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEVPOK1787070452

FAQ

Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics company and CEVA Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics and CEVA Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Markitforce POS Logistics or CEVA Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Markitforce POS Logistics or CEVA Logistics ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Markitforce POS Logistics and CEVA Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-102335
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102334
SUMMARY

Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-102333
SUMMARY

httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-102332
SUMMARY

Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-101262
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-28
UPDATED
Date2026-09-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3