Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Manage My Health Australia » MANCAN1768181684

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MANCAN1768181684)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-113
Company Score Before Incident750 / 1000
Company Score After Incident637 / 1000
Company LinkView Manage My Health Australia Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMANCAN1768181684
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDBank account numbers, administrative data
INCIDENT DATE17/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Manage My Health Australia's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Manage My Health Australia Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Manage My Health Australia breach identified under incident ID MANCAN1768181684.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Manage My Health Australia's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/managemyhealth-au, the number of followers: 72, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 2 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 750 and after the incident was 637 with a difference of -113 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Manage My Health Australia and their customers.

On 12 December 2025, Canopy Health disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Canopy Health Cyber Attack and Data Breach".

A leading private provider of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, Canopy Health, experienced a cyber attack where an unknown person temporarily obtained unauthorized access to a part of its systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Administrative systems, servers, and exposing Bank account numbers, administrative data.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Incident contained, and stakeholders are being briefed through Direct notifications to affected individuals, website update.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Direct notifications to affected individuals, website Q&A.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to an administrative server and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities exploited in healthcare platforms. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to administrative systems suggests credential compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating bank account numbers and administrative data copied. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data may have been copied from systems and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare data breaches often involve cloud exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating incident contained but data may have been copied. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating delayed notifications suggest evasion of detection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Defense Evasion
Indicator Removal (60%)

Sources & References