Comparison Overview
ManageEngine LATAM

ManageEngine LATAM
Autopista norte, km 19 Centro Empresarial TYFA, Oficina 202, Chía, Cundinamarca, CO, 250008
Last Update: 04/12/2025
Como la división de administración de TI de Zoho Corporation, ManageEngine se concentra en brindar soluciones flexibles que funcionen para todo tipo de empresas independientemente de su tamaño o presupuesto. #ITSM #ITOM #SIEM #UEMS #Ciberseguridad #Cybersecurity Manage...

Amazon
2127 7th Ave., Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 09/08/2026
Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. We are driven by the excitement of building technologies, inventing products, and providing service...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ManageEngine LATAM







Amazon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ManageEngine LATAM in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Amazon has 967.96% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ManageEngine LATAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ManageEngine LATAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Amazon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amazon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ManageEngine LATAM

Amazon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.